Who is right? - Page 2

See basically Naitik does not know wt the actual prob is he is just supporting Rashmi looking @Nikhil's behaviour to an extent its right the way he behaves gives an idea that he has no feeling for any relationship where as akshi knows the matter..bt i am sure No brother will want her own sis get divorced so even Naitik will not want a divorce.. for her own sis ...at last they'll show Naksh together bringing Rashmi and Nikhil together

Originally posted by: pree4ru

See basically Naitik does not know wt the actual prob is he is just supporting Rashmi looking @Nikhil's behaviour to an extent its right the way he behaves gives an idea that he has no feeling for any relationship where as akshi knows the matter..bt i am sure No brother will want her own sis get divorced so even Naitik will not want a divorce.. for her own sis ...at last they'll show Naksh together bringing Rashmi and Nikhil together

I agree with you all. but both natik and akshara are correct at theirpoint. Actually both natik and akshara do not know what happen with both rashmi and nikil. According both rashmi and nikil are immature and the way they are behaving is like childish. They both do not know the meaning of marriage. It is not there fault it is there parents fault. When rashmi rejected the first alliance did gaya ever try to know what rashmi wanted a big noo. Even when rj told to rethink abt the alliance did rb and gaya tried to enqiury noo. Rashmi asked nikil abt the girl and he told something and they believed it. How the hell parents behave like that.

Above all the incidents before marriage but after marriage when rb know abt the nikil during namakaran what did he do nothing? did gaya ever sit with rashmi and talked to her how her marriage life is a big noo. Gaya is always busy to trouble akshara rather than concentrating her daughter life. Even yesterday also she is also done a big mistake by asking akshara to solve the rashmi problem. Is Akshara is nmother of rashmi or gayatri is the mother.

Whatever Rahmi told reason to akshara regarding her divorce are very stupid and foolish. Initially she used to like that all, but what happened now. She is acting childish. Regarding natik supporting rahmi he does not know all this by seeing one incident he came to conculsion that nikil does not love her which is not his fault every brother will do that.

Originally posted by: Saraella

if you think logically then there is no love. No respect, nothing between rashmi nikhil so then why should they suffer in the relationship which has totally nothing?

I know no one wants divorce but if this divorce could do better for both of them then there is nothing wrong in it. if this could make their life better than this is right. At least they have to suffer with each other for their rest of the life.

if there is love between rashmi nikhil then why did he sented divorce papers to rashmi. akshi natik and nandini mohit were seprated too but they didnt did this it was because they love each other. if rashmi dont want to live with nikil or nikil dont want to live with rashmi then there is no sense of tieing them in a force relatonshop. after all its their life and they have right to take their decisions.

i dont think Nikhil and rashmi have a valid reason to give up their marriges ? we cant adjust so divorce?? thats stupidity marriage mein both the partners hv to adjust and live life they need to change for one another i am liking this track... as reality mein bhi divorce have increased just bcoz of lack of adjustment...

Originally posted by: pree4ru

i dont think Nikhil and rashmi have a valid reason to give up their marriges ? we cant adjust so divorce?? thats stupidity marriage mein both the partners hv to adjust and live life they need to change for one another i am liking this track... as reality mein bhi divorce have increased just bcoz of lack of adjustment...

Originally posted by: Saraella

they have no reasons top get divorce and I agree but now they are realizing that there is no love between them so if they will keep their fake and loveless marriage then they have to suffer their whole life and if a kid happen then he or she too will suffer whole life. so its better to divorce than suffering with each other for rest of their life.

who said they dont love??? the fact is they just wann give up as they cant adjust that doesnt mean they do not love each other basically its not thier fault bt circumstances are like that instead of sitting and talking they wanna part their ways...

Originally posted by: pree4ru

who said they dont love??? the fact is they just wann give up as they cant adjust that doesnt mean they do not love each other basically its not thier fault bt circumstances are like that instead of sitting and talking they wanna part their ways...

Originally posted by: pree4ru

who said they dont love??? the fact is they just wann give up as they cant adjust that doesnt mean they do not love each other basically its not thier fault bt circumstances are like that instead of sitting and talking they wanna part their ways...