Fundamental mistake by CVs - Page 3

Originally posted by: HamiSky

My view.. I completely disagree!
The CVs are painting a very realistic picture!

Was K ever well groomed b4 this incident"/ He never damned to care about what others will think about him or his behaviour..its always what he intends to say or do...his frankness forms the basic character of K.

It was during their first honeymoon that he beat a stranger black n blue jsut coz he shook hands with his wife. But in stead of being quite talkative he was angry...madly angry. Just coz ana ngry looking K is handsome does that make him groomed or civilized..

He wants to open a restaurant..he wants to know some things..he asked the waiter thats all...this was K we ahve been seeing all along never caring about others to say wat he wants.

The icing on the cake was P looking him with a smile..coz she knows him better than the other two who were with them..

I jsut thoroughly enjoyed the scene.

@ bold me too 😳😳😳

Originally posted by: starlight123

K's behaviour so far in Mumbai has been all in character...He speaks his mind and says what he feels and those actions might look as a baffoon to many and many of us may think twice to do what he does..

But the beauty of his character is that he does not give a damn what others think about him or how he behaves in front of someone..It is a good quality to have because we as educated people think too much of what others may say or judge and wont act in a certain way...

Neelima's character is like that and her uneasiness in seeing K behave this way showed for her that K's behaviour lacked etiquette and was not civilised behaviour.. Where Neelima judged K, K accepted Neelima and Abhishek without passing judgement...

Here education has not helped Neelima, IMO by having misconception about K..

As for going ga ga over tall buildings and mumbai in general he has been more vocal whereas P has been constrained in her response which makes it seem that K is acting like a village idiot and not P...That is the only difference between the 2...

To me it is less to do with K but rather to do with our own thinking of civilised behaviour and what we consider civilised behaviour..

@bold 1..Exactly..he dint behaved like an idiot.
@bold ...yes ..agree compeltely..it was coz we LIKE k n we WUDNT LIKE do such things taht K did..we are not very comfry seeing it...but as the show..his char...everything was in place.