@smeenakshi76
I too have read such an article... but there is no such strong evidences to prove this fact...
History of around 350 BC is not so clear to us. According to an another article which I read months ago,
it was stated that chandragupta was an Iranian!!!! and the patliputra referred in the history is actually the city Patali...hence I found it false. because after reading the whole article, the main conclusion drawn was alex never visited India if so then who was chanakya. we all know chanakya was definitely an Indian because he was a "khuli shikha wala brahman" after all...
thus it can be clearly seen that history has many versions... it is upon us how we take it...