Now coming back to the topic for the week, as per the heading we are not here to discuss the age old debate about the chicken or the egg. But rather we are here to ascertain whether who was truly the king. If anyone has read Macbeth by William Shakespeare, we know it was because of the prophecy by the witches, Macbeth took the throne from the King. In this, we have Chanakya who made a normal boy into a magnificent king as well as making India as one. He was perhaps the founder of modern day India by incorporating, administration, politics, social, economics, philosophy, military and many more things that defines a nation.
Right now let's discuss could Chandragupta be the king her is without Chanakya, could the Akhand Bharat ever existed? They say it takes two hands to clap, which is the case to me between Chanakya and Chandragupta. Chanakya probably couldn't have achieves his dreams without Chandrapgupta and vice versa. They say great leaders are born, never made and king makers will always be an instrumental tool in making them.
So who is the chicken and who is the egg and which came first? In other words who is the real king?
😳