.....sattabazar put bet n chang got less votes as compared to sushant n also showed that changs win was rigged n due to this sony got 100 crore profit and sattabazar lose that amount ......aaj tak said that CHANG KI 100 CRORE KI BAIMANI JEET....
Mannat Har Khushi Paane Ki: Episode Discussion Thread - 25
BALH Naya Season EDT Week #10: Aug 18 - Aug 22
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai - 18 Aug 2025 EDT
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai - 19 Aug 2025 EDT
GAADI CHOOTH GAYI 18.8
DAHII HANDI 19.8
Shradhanjali to Mr Anshuman Raizada
Disaster Monday: War 2 falls 75% to Rs. 6 cr, shows cancelled
Back to the pavilion when??
Did i heard right ???????
KJO To Return In 2026 With Classic Hindi Cinema
Faissal Khan's Shocking Revelations
Param Sundari ..Yay or Nay ?
I find it unprofessional
Rashmika Mandanna & Vijay Devarakonda India Day New York parade
Originally posted by: misskatrina
LOL i like ultimate's reply the best. people are just saying this as there were no controversies around Chang. Come on guys, it's just a show. Your favorite person isn't always gonna win, there's always a winner and a loser just deal with it. I'm sure the celebrities aren't making as much of a big deal out of this than we are. Have good sportsmanship and just go with the flow not everything is expected to go a certain way as much as you believe it.
Originally posted by: xx-Rai-xx
everyone knows that Chang's winning is fake
Sushant is the #1 actor in tv now n won almost all the best actor award this yearn he also plays the lead in the #1 showso there is no way that Sushant could have lostso its obvious that its scripted
I guess, show was not about who is #1 as an actor, it was about dancing. So, if he had won all the best actor awards doesnt justify that he is #1 dancer as well.Originally posted by: xx-Rai-xx
everyone knows that Chang's winning is fake
Sushant is the #1 actor in tv now n won almost all the best actor award this yearn he also plays the lead in the #1 showso there is no way that Sushant could have lostso its obvious that its scripted
if he/she is willing to provide the article or source as to where they got this from, then i can also look at it and determine if the source is valid. but no such proof is provided. and so "innocent until proven guilty."