Woman as ....??? - Page 6

Originally posted by: Believe

Ego is simply ego....it is neither male nor female...😆

There are two types of mind in the world... the mind of those who dominate.. the male mind, and the mind of those who like to be dominated....the female mind. ...By female I don't mean women, or by male, men.....There are women who have masculine minds and there are men who have feminine minds.... They are not always the same😃

well why can't the mind who likes to dominate be called "female-mind?" why the male connotation to it? why is a "feminine" mind considered weaker? and by feminine, i don't mean women either. why is the weaker mind called "feminine" is my question.

Originally posted by: qwertyesque

Women can do everything except where lot of thinking/imagination is involved...they are strong and good earthly creatures...and most of the listed ones in bold belong to this practical earthly cateogories.. now lets take painting and music... the real names you can have are ....picasso, salvadore dali, angelo, van gogh, gaguin, rembrandt... then in music.. beethoven, mozart, bach, wagner.... then shakespeare... its not that women cant be creative or intelligent,... they are not simply wired that way.. in general....although these two fields in USA are considered more girly damn, the americans!!!

Originally posted by: ahmadalikhan

Maybe they are afraid to lose their wife...exactly

Originally posted by: Rapier

well why can't the mind who likes to dominate be called "female-mind?" why the male connotation to it? why is a "feminine" mind considered weaker? and by feminine, i don't mean women either. why is the weaker mind called "feminine" is my question.

Originally posted by: Rapier

well why can't the mind who likes to dominate be called "female-mind?" why the male connotation to it? why is a "feminine" mind considered weaker? and by feminine, i don't mean women either. why is the weaker mind called "feminine" is my question.

Originally posted by: Suvi7884

um dude, thats only because in those times it wasnt respectable for women to do anything besides work in their house, cook, look after kids and all that...if, then, they could be allowed to draw, to think freely, they would be equal to all these men that you have mentioned...its only because those men and the "culture" back then didn't allow women to do all this.

So Joan d'arc was an exception, so was anne conway, marie curie, mary canendish...i dont think it was so reserved, ok lets forget history for a while.. whats the situation today.?? how many women are accomplished neuro surgeons.. cts, economists... in last 50 years... i dont mean to say here about abilities...but it is what it is...how many women presidents US has.. given that US is advanced and women are not so suppressed or held back.. ..sometimes thinks are the way are for a reason...

Originally posted by: qwertyesque

So Joan d'arc was an exception, so was anne conway, marie curie, mary canendish...i dont think it was so reserved, ok lets forget history for a while.. whats the situation today.?? how many women are accomplished neuro surgeons.. cts, economists... in last 50 years... i dont mean to say here about abilities...but it is what it is...how many women presidents US has.. given that US is advanced and women are not so suppressed or held back.. ..sometimes thinks are the way are for a reason...

Women dont need to be the president of US. Being the first lady of US they weild all the power that they want minus the restrictions and reponsibilities. so who is smarter?