Criminal Charges on Moral Grounds

yes ur rite,this is stupidity they are showing,

i don't think anything like this exist at all.

i mean how can they held manav responsible for death of the workers,

Only Ekta can do this.

And which responsibility are they talking about, but it is the owners, Satish's and darmesh"s responsibility,not of a worker like Manav.

I M SORRY but i think that the CV's are mentally sick

Originally posted by: -SONU-

yes ur rite,this is stupidity they are showing,

i don't think anything like this exist at all.

i mean how can they held manav responsible for death of the workers,

Only Ekta can do this.

And which responsibility are they talking about, but it is the owners, Satish's and darmesh"s responsibility,not of a worker like Manav.

I M SORRY but i think that the CV's are mentally sick

Didn't Prakash frame Manav saying that Manav had sent those two men to steal raw material inspite of knowing that those machinery are defective..... this would be a case of criminal negligence causing death, the inspector used easy terminology that people could understand........

Originally posted by: Arien_03

BTW did Manav change his profession, he was a mechanic who has work experience with motor vehicles, what is he doing in a company that processes some kind of raw material and sells it?