To each his own, I'd say. 😊 Though the movie is nowhere near to being called a flawless work of art (far, far from it), I thought it was a pretty successful and intelligent attempt (at that point of time) at making a movie that does not deal with the typical Bollywood themes. Personally, what I liked about the film (barring the performances) was that everything was done and shown very subtly and gently, instead of dramatizing or overemphasizing it. Another thing I liked was the way the characters transformed and grew up throughout the span of the nine years.
It's not a film for everyone though. If you are a fan of high drama or melodrama, or filed-with-climax-or-action movies, then Hum Tum won't work for you. Try a SLB or KJo film for that purpose.
But as someone already mentioned, the true strength of the movie lied in the performances. I don't think I need to start on Saif or Rani's performances because they are self-evident. Even the supporting casts - be it Kiron Kher, Rishi Kapoor or Rati Agnihotri - breathed lives into their respective characters.
As far as awards are concerned - most of them are based on public voting, and if the public votes for them, we really can't hold the award ceremonies at blame. And I agree that Saif did not deserve a National Award; that was stretching things a bit too much. But I liked his performance nonetheless.
Coming to whether it is a worthy remake of WHMS or not - well, how many "worthy" remakes can Bollywood boast of? Not many. Not even the films that they copy from Tollywoods. 😛
Lastly, while I can rationalize why Ash's name was brought forth in the first page, I think it's best to leave the matter at that. Ash has nothing to do with the topic at hand, and talking about how she would have looked with Saif is stretching our imaginations too far. 😆
Edited by PhoeniXof_Hades - 14 years ago
0