Clarification NEEDED![help]

Page

Chahat17

@Chahat17

Inactive

Posted: 19 years ago

...technically, wouldnt Tanisha be Krish's BIOLOGICAL mother not mamta...b/c mamta was only a surrogate mother...then why is Mamta always calling Krish her "son"?...i m so confused...can some1 clarifiy this for me...pls!

Quote

Frequent Posters

Saregama_fan

@Saregama_fan

Dazzler

+ 2

Posted: 19 years ago

Yes you might have a point here. Because if mamta was only there to carry the baby, then the baby has none her genes 😆, so is not really her kid.

Actually the true mother would be the one who donated the egg (in bio terms), and I am not sure who that is, tanisha or mamta, maybe someone else could clarify that...

Edited by Saregama_fan - 19 years ago

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Chahat17

@Chahat17

Inactive

Posted: 19 years ago

...yeah some1 pls clarify this for me...even i thought that was really weird b/c the whole show is based on Mamta being the "mother" of Krish...but technically she is not the biological mother...maybeee Tanisha is the biological mother...but then y would she hate her own son?! 😕 ...som1 PLS CLARIFY THIS FOR ME!!!!!!!!!!

Quote

Sohni

@-Sohniye-

Inactive

Posted: 19 years ago

lol okie guys...krish has MAMTA and AKSHAY'S genes..when she was injected..she was only injected with akshay's sperm..and then she got pregnant...krish has mamta and akshay's blood...he has absolutely nothing to do with Tanisha, thats why Tanisha could hate him...and yes Mamta is the one who donated the egg..hehe i hope thats clarifying enoughhh 😃

Quote

Saregama_fan

@Saregama_fan

Dazzler

+ 2

Posted: 19 years ago

😆 😆 I love it how we have to totally break everything down to understand the main theme of the show. They need to more clear in show and stop confusing us 😆 😆 !!!