DID format needs change - Page 2

Created

Last reply

Replies

15

Views

1.1k

Users

9

Likes

13

Frequent Posters

ankit_nyc thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#11
Totally agree.........I felt that all three mentors were biased towards their contestants in DID 2.....The show became more about he said/ she said rather then about talent in the show.......Replace Mithun Da with Farah and have the three mentors just choreograph the contestants, and rotate the contestants every week so it minimizes the bias......😊
Edited by ankit_nyc - 15 years ago
mishcutie90 thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#12

Originally posted by: dramebaaz

Master geeta,terence and remo shouldnot be judging their own acts...i mean the choreographer would obviously praise their own acts no matter how bad it was and would always try and put down contestants from other team..its not fair to the contestants..this system is not followed any dance show except for DID

We need a fair and knowledgeable grandmaster who is qualified to judge a dance show and be able to give constructive criticisms

The rotation of contestants is also a good option..what say friends?

i don't think they really put down others contestants. i love the DID family terrence remo geeta they all get along with each other well. yea they all support their contestants full heartedly but there have been a time when remo has stated that he wasn't happy with his contestants performance. i forgot which episode it was. also he gave out 3 MJ bands in DID 2 and 2 of them were to contestants of terrence's team. also I feel terrence is the same way he praises others when they do well and also states his contestant's flaws.
ppl will say I have something against geeta but I really don't. I honestly feel if there is anyone out of that 3 who is least coordial out of the 3 it is geeta. when it comes to other contestants for most part she will only say "good attempt" but with her contestants' mediocre performance she is all in praising and crying. she just needs to mature up a bit. if u c her mentor farah khan. farah obviously has a soft corner for geeta ki gang but she is very fair when it comes to judging. she dosnt let it influence her decisions while judging.
Rimpa. thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#13

Originally posted by: mishcutie90

i don't think they really put down others contestants. i love the DID family terrence remo geeta they all get along with each other well. yea they all support their contestants full heartedly but there have been a time when remo has stated that he wasn't happy with his contestants performance. i forgot which episode it was. also he gave out 3 MJ bands in DID 2 and 2 of them were to contestants of terrence's team. also I feel terrence is the same way he praises others when they do well and also states his contestant's flaws.

ppl will say I have something against geeta but I really don't. I honestly feel if there is anyone out of that 3 who is least coordial out of the 3 it is geeta. when it comes to other contestants for most part she will only say "good attempt" but with her contestants' mediocre performance she is all in praising and crying. she just needs to mature up a bit. if u c her mentor farah khan. farah obviously has a soft corner for geeta ki gang but she is very fair when it comes to judging. she dosnt let it influence her decisions while judging.

Cutie, the masters don't exactly put down contestants of other mentors but biasness does come gradually. At audition phase or initial stage (pre public voting) they really praise each other but as soon as the wild card round ends they try to glorify their own contestant. I find this very human and that's the nature of the competition too. But sometime people get really overboard as you have mentioned and problem starts creeping in. I don't want to single out Geeta because I am biased towards Remo and Terence. Some people may have other opinion. So best way to prevent this is to have one or two technically sound GMs who will give fair judgment. This format really worked for DID LM. Although we can still argue that Farah was biased towards Dharmesh and Sandeep towards Jai but overall it was mostly fair.

Also as many people said here, I too think rotation of contestant will be a good idea.

mishcutie90 thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#14

Originally posted by: rimpa_love11

Cutie, the masters don't exactly put down contestants of other mentors but biasness does come gradually. At audition phase or initial stage (pre public voting) they really praise each other but as soon as the wild card round ends they try to glorify their own contestant. I find this very human and that's the nature of the competition too. But sometime people get really overboard as you have mentioned and problem starts creeping in. I don't want to single out Geeta because I am biased towards Remo and Terence. Some people may have other opinion. So best way to prevent this is to have one or two technically sound GMs who will give fair judgment. This format really worked for DID LM. Although we can still argue that Farah was biased towards Dharmesh and Sandeep towards Jai but overall it was mostly fair.

Also as many people said here, I too think rotation of contestant will be a good idea.

well said rimpa yea now that i put more thoughts into it i feel that they are biased towards their own one and hun trust me except for remo i didnt knw much about geeta or terrence from before but geeta ma's "good attempt" in more than half the performances of other terrence's and remo's contestants just pisses me off
Edited by mishcutie90 - 15 years ago
maya123 thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#15
why fix something that aint broken???
The show format is so popular - some lines from the show have become legendry. Until people get tired of the show, the format should remain the same.
People like familiarity; that is why sequels are so popular.
thewiseone thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#16

Originally posted by: ankit_nyc

Totally agree.........I felt that all three mentors were biased towards their contestants in DID 2.....The show became more about he said/ she said rather then about talent in the show.......Replace Mithun Da with Farah and have the three mentors just choreograph the contestants, and rotate the contestants every week so it minimizes the bias......😊



this actually sounds fine minus the rotation, but please not farah for GM. i am not questioning her knowledge in dance, but i can see the future topics and fights if she is the GM. people will be saying she is supporting geeta cuz geeta is her student and farah is showing favoritsm and blah blah blah. i mean ppl already are saying tht farah showed favoritsm towards dharmesh, who is just a student of geeta's. imagine it being actually geeta. then the accusations will increase. im not saying farah will show favoritsm, but there is always a chance that she might. so farah is a bad option. and no sandip either. kinda tired of these two. someone new and someone who has no relation to any of the three masters would be good. or maybe we can have 2 or 3 GMs instead of only one. one for all western dances and one for all indian dances. so basically all i wanna change in the format is the GM. thats about it. everything else is fine the way it is IMO. i dunno. just a thought.😉
Edited by thewiseone - 15 years ago

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".