Has Tapasya left evidence behind? PG 5..VEER KNOWS

Did anyone notice that when tapasya returned to jogi house she did not have that beautiful red stole which she had worn on that unfortunate day....

From the very first time when ichcha wore it to the restaurant i was wondering what role this stole is playing in this entire story..
It was hardly chilly for ichcha to have carried it along to wear on her saree...and it was not even her style statement.......
Then she forgets it in the restaurant....which veer takes home n leaves it on the small table...
Next day tapasya conveniently picks it to wear on her chudidaar suit...and goes to meet sid...
Later our poor vansh who was following his dear wife ichcha .....mistaking tapasya's this stole to ichcha's red saree pallo ....follows it not realising that he was following tapasya to his doom....
Now Taps has returned without it to jogi house.....

So where has the journey of that stole led it too...
has taps left it behind at the crime scene???
was this the major role that this stole was playing ????
Is it going to be that crucial evidence against taps which will expose her eventually
...as ichcha n veer both will definitely recognise this stole n wonder how it came to be there on the crime scene...... as both know Ichcha had left it behind in the restaurant that day...
Will veer remember that taps was wearing it on that dreadful day when vansh was shot and connect vansh's death to tapasya.....?

Knowing the Cvs favouritism towards tapasya...I doubt it....for all u know they might twist the whole story
hope they dont make Ichcha think that veer is trying to implicate her in vansh's murder....
or they will prove that since it originally belongs to Ichcha so she may be some how responsible for Vansh's death...
or someother stupid reason to save their darling Tapasya

as i am not expecting too much out of that useless sid ( who has recorded the entire vansh taps interaction in his mobile) who is used by the CVs only to raise viewers hopes ...to later dash them to the ground ...as till date he has not been able to complete a single job that he set out to do....

I am hoping that the new detective will be able to solve the case with help of this inanimate object 'the red stole' (hoping she has left it behind on the crime scene) and bring justice to our dear Vansh by finally catching and punishing the main culprit in this entire fiasco..ie Tapasya.....

What say guys/gals...please give your opinion on this.....

yeh but how r they gonna pin her for murder even if the stole was there? they might find her bloody clothes or that stole but her fingerprints are not on that gun and sid's evidence shows suicide so unless tapu is framed for murder which would be wrong cos it was suicide...sid's evidence is utterly useless! and im sick of sid now! either he exposes her or gets the hell out of the story! im sick of it i tell u!

Tapasya is Blue Eyed Baby of Creatives and I am sure they all caught Iccha for his murder . Only Veer will be back her and Taps again can convenienntly tell that How he loves iccha so he is backing her. This is all non sense ,stupid and ruthless creatives .

i thought iccha would blame veer not the other way round

Originally posted by: SRKLuvr

yeh but how r they gonna pin her for murder even if the stole was there? they might find her bloody clothes or that stole but her fingerprints are not on that gun and sid's evidence shows suicide so unless tapu is framed for murder which would be wrong cos it was suicide...sid's evidence is utterly useless! and im sick of sid now! either he exposes her or gets the hell out of the story! im sick of it i tell u!

I am not saying they will say she shot vansh..... though i believe she as good as shot him....but abetment to suicide is also a major crime.....
and most important Ichcha n Veer will know that she was there on the fateful day...and she did not come in front of them...when veer reached vansh, vansh was already lying there bleeding...so veer will definitely suspect tapasya of some foul play....that much is also enough to get suspicions moving towards tapasya...rest will follow.....

Originally posted by: SRKLuvr

i thought iccha would blame veer not the other way round

this was just a thought how these silly Cvs can twist the entire fact to save taps...

Originally posted by: SRKLuvr

yeh but how r they gonna pin her for murder even if the stole was there? they might find her bloody clothes or that stole but her fingerprints are not on that gun and sid's evidence shows suicide so unless tapu is framed for murder which would be wrong cos it was suicide...sid's evidence is utterly useless! and im sick of sid now! either he exposes her or gets the hell out of the story! im sick of it i tell u!

Veer should use his common sense for that The stole is Ichcha's which she forgot at the restaurant and he brought it to his place and kept it on a table Who else will will wear a stole in that house except Tapasya 😉 😉 He's got to use some brains for that to make out that Taps might have been there

Originally posted by: divy609

Veer should use his common sense for that The stole is Ichcha's which she forgot at the restaurant and he brought it to his place and kept it on a table Who else will will wear a stole in that house except Tapasya 😉 😉 He's got to use some brains for that to make out that Taps might have been there

divya i am sure tapasya picked that stole from the table right in front of veer as he was just there talking on his mobile .....so surely when he will be shown that stole he will remember ...

Originally posted by: cjs369

divya i am sure tapasya picked that stole from the table right in front of veer as he was just there talking on his mobile .....so surely when he will be shown that stole he will remember ...

I doubt that Charu Veer will surely remember the Stole because it is Ichcha's 😉 But I doubt if he saw Taps taking it He was more busy speaking on his cell Though I hope he makes it out

ji i understand that u guys hate tapu but to pin anyone of murder wrongly is not right! she didnt pull the trigger and had no intention to induce suicide so it is neither murder nor abettment to suicide! this simply cannot be legally proven in the courts! the only thing it will prove is that she was there at the site!