Posted:
Hi All,
Just want to state this POV about Anmol's Naming and his entrance.
I understand that when we love someone then its hard to just move on but I feel that there is a biass-ness when it comes to women.
I do not wish to sound feminist as I am not.
When a woman looses everything she has in every right to get married again and to start her life over. Just because she loved a man doesn't mean she cannot love another after the first love is gone.
For a woman , its hard to love two men same way at the same time where as for men its not that hard. Our society can accept men having more than one wife but they cannot accept women having more than one husband , its looked down upon etc.
Also, for women to think of marriage after the end of the first for what ever reason is also not a welcoming idea!
Where as when men do the same thing we accept the change fast enough subconsciously.
This entier situation is clearly seen with Ragini's life. She is expected to mourn Ranveer's death even after she got married ( for what ever reason). I personally think that her raising Ranveer's child is enough proof that she def. loved her husband and takes care for his amanat more than her own life.
But does that mean she has no right to live a life of her own? To have some love and comfort of a Husband as good as Anmol (as its portrayed so far?) Who has not only whole heartedly accept Tami but also is like a standing pillar for her family.
I think we have to come above this that yes even though one chapter of love has been closed another has opened and just because Ragini starts loving Anmol and treats him as her husband she has insulted Ranveer or defamed his memory. Rather by keeping herself sane and healthy she is taking care of her family and thus making Ranveer happy and keeping him very much alive in her life.
About Naming its kind of good that they chose Anmol because Ranveer was given the name of Anmol due to his character and thus if there is to be a person who can enter in Ragini's life who is worthy of her then , he has to possess the same qualities that she prices in her Anmol. So the name is very appropriate with his character-relationship with Ragini.
I was watching Baliva Vadhu's old videos ( sorry mods , another serial is mentioned here for reference only) and there the daughter of one of the main characters becomes Vidhwa ( widow) and a marriage proposal comes. Her grandmother (very strict) says how is this possible, this is janam janam's rishta, this marriage is for 7 janams etc. So she cannot get married to another man.
Then the father says, well isnt' the rishta for both men and women? Don't both the husband and wife share this 7 janam ka rishta deal? if yes then why is it allowed for men who's wives die , to remarry?
Don't they break the purity of it as well.
So if we put Ragini in that position, lets say Ranveer does die and now that Ragini is widow, does she really have to raise the child all by herself just to prove her love?
Thats unfair and incorrect.
I say even if there was no majboori involved Ragini if she wished to remarry for what ever reasons (and of course we all know she did it for her home) its absolutely fine.
my 2 cents.
Just want to state this POV about Anmol's Naming and his entrance.
I understand that when we love someone then its hard to just move on but I feel that there is a biass-ness when it comes to women.
I do not wish to sound feminist as I am not.
When a woman looses everything she has in every right to get married again and to start her life over. Just because she loved a man doesn't mean she cannot love another after the first love is gone.
For a woman , its hard to love two men same way at the same time where as for men its not that hard. Our society can accept men having more than one wife but they cannot accept women having more than one husband , its looked down upon etc.
Also, for women to think of marriage after the end of the first for what ever reason is also not a welcoming idea!
Where as when men do the same thing we accept the change fast enough subconsciously.
This entier situation is clearly seen with Ragini's life. She is expected to mourn Ranveer's death even after she got married ( for what ever reason). I personally think that her raising Ranveer's child is enough proof that she def. loved her husband and takes care for his amanat more than her own life.
But does that mean she has no right to live a life of her own? To have some love and comfort of a Husband as good as Anmol (as its portrayed so far?) Who has not only whole heartedly accept Tami but also is like a standing pillar for her family.
I think we have to come above this that yes even though one chapter of love has been closed another has opened and just because Ragini starts loving Anmol and treats him as her husband she has insulted Ranveer or defamed his memory. Rather by keeping herself sane and healthy she is taking care of her family and thus making Ranveer happy and keeping him very much alive in her life.
About Naming its kind of good that they chose Anmol because Ranveer was given the name of Anmol due to his character and thus if there is to be a person who can enter in Ragini's life who is worthy of her then , he has to possess the same qualities that she prices in her Anmol. So the name is very appropriate with his character-relationship with Ragini.
I was watching Baliva Vadhu's old videos ( sorry mods , another serial is mentioned here for reference only) and there the daughter of one of the main characters becomes Vidhwa ( widow) and a marriage proposal comes. Her grandmother (very strict) says how is this possible, this is janam janam's rishta, this marriage is for 7 janams etc. So she cannot get married to another man.
Then the father says, well isnt' the rishta for both men and women? Don't both the husband and wife share this 7 janam ka rishta deal? if yes then why is it allowed for men who's wives die , to remarry?
Don't they break the purity of it as well.
So if we put Ragini in that position, lets say Ranveer does die and now that Ragini is widow, does she really have to raise the child all by herself just to prove her love?
Thats unfair and incorrect.
I say even if there was no majboori involved Ragini if she wished to remarry for what ever reasons (and of course we all know she did it for her home) its absolutely fine.
my 2 cents.
CID
Kabhi Neem Neem Kabhi Shahad Shahad
Bigg Boss 19
Bade Achhe Lagte Hain
