Trash nikalo, Vaada karo, Head Office Sambalo! - Page 5

Originally posted by: tanthya

Is it ? then chop him block by block , eat him or dump him in dustbin or melt him in the Sun, I am getting tired of seeing his scowl and frowning face.....😡

Originally posted by: stillhopeful

ok a simple thought eh - So essentially Pratigya's marriage with Krishna was not a love marriage just like Pratigya's marriage to Nitin would not have been a love marriage.

Pratigya agreed to marry a person like Nitin becasue she feared Angad and then she agreed to marry Krishna because she feared Krishna and Angad.

So if she did not love Nitin would she ALSO have not consummated the marriage with Nitin jsut like she does not want to consummate this marriage.

In order for a woman to willingly have sex with a man there has to be either love or attraction. if both exist it is a bonus. as no one walks into an arranged marriage with love, based on the willing sex argument, most marriages in India would be platonic. I would not be born and so also many of my friends and siblings. this is a crude fact but real nonetheless and I take absolutely no pleasure in saying this. I myself am very lucky to have married someone I loved and was attracted to but had I not met him when I did I too would have ended up in an arranged marriage. We as girls in Indian conservative society are prepared from early years for this eventuality. again another fact.

So In krishna's case there is no love but the attraction is undeniable whether she ackowledges it or not. you see it in the friction b/w the two of them. a hostile unwilling attraction of sorts.I have said from the day they met on the street and locked eyes, that she was drawn to Krishna for she couldn't help turning to look at him many times before she got on the rickshaw. Krishna lets his heart lead and he knows that she is not indifferent to him deep down in his heart. That is why he has taken all sorts of crap from her. He even told her she likes to hide her love while he expresses it freely. He was spot-on with that one. Every time she gets angry at him she wasn't storming away indifferently, but glaring at him, locking eyes. I will even go on a limb that some of her angry outbursts at him comes from s.f.(you know what I mean😉). Her heart is drawn to him, her head is talking her out of it bec of the limitations in her thinking of what her spouse MUST be like, and she is fighting a battle within herself. The current track is going to let her heart lead into friendship but then her head is going to control it when Angad comes lying. Eventually the head will lose and she will have to fight for Krishna with everything she's got and her heart leads her to do. Her head gets her deeper into a hole. The heart wants what it does, no rhyme or reason and she will be on this see-saw till she learns that universal truth.
In Nitins' case there was neither love nor attraction, she admitted this to Arushi before Krishna realized that Nitin was in the picture as a groom not a family firend.Actually she shared that with Rolli on Jan 1 episode.

So her reasons for non-consummating the marriage with Krishna also coincidentally would have existed with Nitin.

In that case would the Saxenas have supported this decision of hers to lead a farcial marriage with Nitin or would she have given Nitin a chance (that Krishna is not getting unfortunately for him)

would the saxenas have been equally vocal and upset with the boy's familiies disgust, shame, frustration and anger at the marriage farce or would they have counselled their daughter differently?They are hypocrites, they will turn the way the wind blows to suit their agenda and Prats does the same thing she has learned from her father. She tunes out the sound advice from her mother every time. The only time she seemed to connect to what Nainaji said was when everyone else was dissing Krishna at the dining table during bkfast, after the night he had dinner on the terrace. She was bothered by it and seemed to relate to Nainaji's comment that only a wife will understand what it feels like (relating to her husband).

her reasons for not giving this marriage a chance (now that she knows her reason to fear Krishna was based on a misunderstanding) seem baseless to me and grounded on stubborness rather than rational thought. her father's support follows the same baseless train of thought. Prof. is the instigator who sets a bad example to his children to bad mouth others. As it's often said "children don't do what their parents ask them to do they do what their parents do." How true! Prof. is turning out to be the poor role model. Wah! A baap who is bent on ruining his children's lives. He told Adarsh not to bring Komal home yet, he told Prats to keep the truth from Krishna.