I'm ringing up Women Rights Assn!Warning pg20 - Page 24

I have stopped watching DMG ever since Armaan returned. I really like his character but his entry happened at the wrong time. DMG has become a KHICHIDI 🤢. I agree AR fans wanna see their fav couple together but I wish they had stronger reasons to justify their quest. Its not like we SR fans sent a petition to CVs to get them married. But now we're fighting just to make sure they don't show improper stuff on TV. Now please dont tell me that fiction doesn't bear an impact on our daily lives because the only reason we are here in IF is that we are hooked onto these shows and they are a part of our daily life. Why else do certain ads/shows put out warnings saying they are a work of fiction or they are dangerous stunts performed with supervisors around and not to try at home in case of any stunts performed by stars for ads/TV shows/movies? They don't want the audience to get carried away and they definitely don't want them to get wrong ideas. What about the many adolscent minds watching this show? Should they be told that its OK even if you dump your spouse for a frivolous reason but love is all that matters? I have come across heated discussions in many other forums, for instance there was one in Kyunki...... for Karan-Nandani-Tanya. There also members were fghting to see their fav couple Hiten Gauri but the reason was justified. They initially portrayed the other woman as a kind, gentle loving person but they screwed her character later on. Here also I see a similar thing happening and I pray that CVs don't screw Sid to unite AR if that's what they have decided. 😡 Many SR fans would've been happy to see AR if SR weren't a married couple. Even if SR were just engaged and about to get married and then had Armaan come back it would've been OK to see AR back together again. Else even if Armaan had come in the initial stage of the marriage when Sid was frustrated with her becoz of the poison drama then also it would've been OK. But he came back when SR were beginning to get feelings for each other and were finally grasping the meaning of marriage and trust. Was that really necessary? Did the TRP's double or triple bcoz of Armaan's entry? It just shot up by a few points. Yes even we love Armaan but what the heck happened to the storyline after his entry? They screwed up everything. Just when SR were understanding each other, misunderstandings came in their way.

Originally posted by: zainab25

What if she slaps him?????????? Oh ma gawsh. Then there will be petitions on how Riddhima is a negative character because she slapped the HERO. Lol...yupp a negative character because she's a woman who had self respect and stopped unwanted advances from a strange man. 🤔 If only she slaps him on behalf of the women and men of the world.

Originally posted by: zainab25

When anyone posts their opinion in a sensible fashion, it'd be a crime for me to then mock it, and you can certainly expect no sort of such behavior from my end.

Of course I understand that he loves her, and he always will. Love is an eerie sentiment, but having said that, you have to get a control on your desires especially if you are revealed to the state and situations. Armaan knows it all...probably more than even Siddhanth and Riddhima, however, he has clearly attempted to make advances toward Riddhima and expected her to reciprocate back when she clearly has no desire to. Even in the pre-cap, it very well seems to me that A doesn't care for his actions, and just lifts R for the sake of pleasure and want without once thinking of the consequences. Of course I may be completely wrong too as none of it has aired yet. The lifting part may be even justified because the story has so far been stagnant and a jolt is needed, but the other pre-cap of A being a tad bit close to R in a dark room conveniently lighting up the room seems more of a pleasure moment than anything else. They can of course talk it out too like normal people without making advances at each other and acquiring selective amnesia at the trip.

Originally posted by: sakshiluvskaran

woman rights say that woman has a right to divorce rather than sticking to a marriage full of misunderstandings........ woman rights imbibe a lot dear..... that u can not be tortured by ur husband be it anything and if u have been forced into marriage u can divorce that person...... In 21st century woman can divorce and remarry and that does not mean she is wrong or she is a bad example for others........ Peace.......

P.S. I am okay with AR or siddhima just want the drama to end......