After all, if she finds out that Krishna wasn't the one who kidnapped her than all this pratigya (vow) track wouldn't have come up ..
WHAT DO YOU GUYS THINK? PLEASE LIKE MY POST IF YOU AGREE...
Page
of
1🏏 ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2026: Ind vs Zim 48th Match,26 Feb 🏏
🏏 ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2026: WI vs SA 47th Match,26 Feb 🏏
MUKTI SAVES MAIRA 26.2
NIGHT STAYY 27.2
Jogan Is Back
TRP ka Kamal Holi par Sasural lauti Abheera
ditto the same thing was on my mind 2, why dnt she ask him i wld ave askd him straight away. why dnt she get to the point watz all this i hate u natak goin on???? come on CVs make it a lil realistic
Originally posted by: Sonya263
Does no one remember the scene before the wedding when Krishna was showing Pratigya his room and he admits to her that he wanted to kidnap her and then fell in love with her.........
Pratigya and any reasonable person would take that as an admission of his guilt.What reason would she have to question him about is afterwards when in her opinion he already admitted that he kidnapped her.I know that he said he was "going" to kidnap her...but semantics aren't really an issue here.....she took that to mean that he did kidnap her. I remember her face in that scene and she didn't even know waht to say...........
Originally posted by: luv4karan
But that scene was co-incidential - krishna meant to kidnap her when the dog and prats scene came..😳 when angad took krishna to kidnap pratigya... hope you didn't forget that..
pratigya had a good chance to question him but she didn't .. i wonder what has happened to the creatives???