Originally posted by: myownarea
Both these replies are completely OFF topic.
I am a person who believes there is NO right or wrong ..it varies from person to person and yes is situational.
However, LOGIC is more specific.
The question -- > How can a guy who is innocent & stupid have donated his sperm and that too when he was a minor.
How can that be shown in a show that had more or less maintained a certain level in its jokes? Can this not be considered a certain deviation ?
Whats the explanation? that it is acceptable because TV has much worse? ISnt that exactly why this is the show people tune to? So if this joins the crowd, then why watch this ..we might as well watch those, am sure logic has more place in those.
divya, when has logic EVER been a part of MJHT? we defended even the lamest of tracks or scenes it MJHT, in the name of logic because then they suited to our tastes ..
neither was ther logiv in MJHT then..nor is ther logic in MJHT now ... but if ther was no objection raised THEN .. why is ther objection rasied now?
again, I m NOT defending that dialogue of uday's..nor m I saying that it is ethical or right in the society's views..its a shame and a huge disgrace when v as a society view it ..
now as far as uday actually donating his sperm is concerened, had he been a real person, then he wil hav never donated his sperm, because, like u said, he is a minor and thats illegal .. but yes, it IS difficult for us to laugh it off in the show as exageration, because it has certain prohibited phrases like 'sperm donation' ..
now @ red : I completely and absolutely agree wit u over here..yes, this kind of thing has come in very suddenly and hence, its diff to accept it NOW .. had it been shown right from the beginning, then prob the audience wud hav been automatically segragated ..
but then again, I hav a diff concern .. and since this topic started off as what influence this has on kids, its for a fact that those who watch MJHT may also watch other shows like MTV splitzvilla and roadies..its not either/or situation..its BOTH..they can watch both .. or if they dont, then they wil come to kno abt these kind of things from their friend circle ..
m not saying that his dialogue is a gem and that its right and blah .. all I m saying is that is that the ONLY reason that suddenly MJHT has been considered disgusting and inappripriate? because honestly, it has been lame since a long long time, we hav just been closing our eyes to it because then it fit in our ethics..and now it doesnt ..
thats ALL that m trying to say here..m not justyfing the track/CVs/those dialogues..they are individualistic whether its moral or immoral..ethical or unethical .. what I m saying is that v hav been accepting certain things in the name of society's ethics for a long time..and now, when v as a society find certain other things as unethical, v are uneasy ...
who creates the society's rules? v do..and v also MAKE that society..a society is made up of different invididuals, wit diff views..diff thoughts..diff mindsets .. then how can a society form rules as ONE unit? then again, I agree the fact that majority rules holds true .. what needs to b considered is that, what majority says true..need not b true always!
u may find even this reply off topic, but I find this is extremely essential for any discussion or any situation in our life ..