Originally posted by: return_to_hades
The first bolded is a matter of fact statement about the end result. Based on what Remo said the previous day that is what the statement came off. It was not nice or professional in the context it came out.
The middle part is where I attempt to defend Shashank, but explaining that I do not think the end result was the intent. Here we have a student who has gratitude towards their master. The intent was not related to Terence, but to thank the master for what he has done for the student. He merely wanted to express his commitment and loyalty. It is an attempt to explain that Shashank did not 'make a dig' but it 'appeared to be one' and he should not receive flak for it.
The second bold explains why despite goodwill the end result occurred. In normal circumstances it would merely be a goodwill gesture. Considering it came immediately after Remo had criticized Terence for not making Shakti versatile and limiting her to the same things, it takes on a different meaning.
Now I can only speak for myself, I am not a representative for Terence fans. Shashank's words came out as 'this proves Remo can do anything and everything'. He could have expressed gratitude on the lines of 'whatever I performed today is due to Remo sirs persistence, faith and hard work in me', 'I appreciate the faith Remo showed in me by giving this challenging performance to me' 'I'm excited to have learned hip hop under Remo, Remo has an astute knowledge of hip hop'. None of these which allude that Remo is more diverse and creative than the other masters.
Will someone have a problem with these words. Probably. Someone always has a problem. However, I would deem it as very professional and admire Shashank for handling it with tact when put on the spot. (I missed mentioning earlier, that we was also put in an interesting spot by the hosts question. They know very well how statements and situations lead to drama and excitement)
There are two sides to a coin. In this case I see them as a student expressing gratitude to master, a situation where wrong words signal wrong meanings. I usually try seeing both sides. It could come off as playing it safe, taking a middle path, flip flopping ' whatever ' so fair enough.
I guess since I consider myself as a Terence fan, I will have to accept being lumped in one group 'Terence fan' that walks alike, talks alike, thinks alike. I will have to endure in between statements or supportive statements being taken as despising contestants etc or nonchalant posts being picked at for alluded meanings. I guess Terence fans deserve it for making a Da Vinci code of Dance India Dance, with their wild conspiracy theories. Beats me how all of us have psychotic wild and vivid imaginations.