Originally posted by: krystal_watz
can the writing of history ever be neutral? what do u all think? is there anything called "a neutral standpoint of viewing history"?
victorious write the history and the defeated argues
✧ Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai || Episode Discussion Thread #2 ✧
GIRLS IN HOSTEL 17.2
🏏ICC Men's T20 W C 2026: Group B, M 30: AUS vs SL at Pallekele🏏
Abheera’s profession
🏏 ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2026, Zim vs Ireland 32nd match 🏏
🏏 ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2026, 31st match NZ vs Canada 17th Feb 🏏
🏏ICC Men's T20 W C 2026: Group B, M 33: Scotland vs Nepal at Mumbai🏏
Siddharth Malhotra s father no more.
BMC Seeks Permanent Blacklist Of Dhurandhar Aditya Dhar Productions
Salim Khan admitted in Lilavati hospital
🏏ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2026:M34: SA vs UAE, Delhi 🏏
Ranveer vs. Ranbir: my take
Alia as presenter at BAFTA awards
Can The Writers Make Sense? Can They Get Facts Right?!
Originally posted by: krystal_watz
can the writing of history ever be neutral? what do u all think? is there anything called "a neutral standpoint of viewing history"?
Originally posted by: gengarjetty2
of course.. every historian knows that the moon is made of snow
Originally posted by: krystal_watz
can the writing of history ever be neutral? what do u all think? is there anything called "a neutral standpoint of viewing history"?
Originally posted by: return_to_hades
The happenings of a past are done and true, that is a fact, history is a fact. The stories will however, always be narrated through a mortal perception. It is up to the readers of these stories to put together two and two and find their own personal truth.
God save Herodotus.