Minaret contoversy in Switzerland

karandel_2008 thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#1
On 29 November 2009, the citizens of Switzerland voted on a referendum to decide on
a ban to construct new minarets. It was passed with 57% in favour;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swiss_referendum,_November_2009

Whats your take on this? Is this wrong or right? Is this against religious freedom?


Edited by karandel_2008 - 16 years ago

Created

Last reply

Replies

10

Views

881

Users

6

Frequent Posters

souro thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 16 years ago
#2
I guess it comes down to the fact that it's their country, their wish. Who are we to say anything in that matter.
return_to_hades thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 16 years ago
#3
It still lets the existing minarets be as it is. Secondly, the next major referendum is a ban on arms export further reducing their involvement in war. I'm not sure why one decision should embroil the Swiss in a controversy. They are neutral, but they have a right to national sovereignty.
karandel_2008 thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#4

Originally posted by: souro

I guess it comes down to the fact that it's their country, their wish. Who are we to say anything in that matter.



Ok that appears to be one point for the ban: Its up to the people of that country. They voted and now they will follow it.

Lets see if there are some contrary views.


souro thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 16 years ago
#5

Originally posted by: return_to_hades

It still lets the existing minarets be as it is. Secondly, the next major referendum is a ban on arms export further reducing their involvement in war. I'm not sure why one decision should embroil the Swiss in a controversy. They are neutral, but they have a right to national sovereignty.


But the second referendum has been rejected.

return_to_hades thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 16 years ago
#6

Originally posted by: souro


But the second referendum has been rejected.



I see now. I misunderstood it as arms export rejected. But now I see it was the referendum reject.

But still it is Switzerland's choice.
Bartz thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#7

Originally posted by: karandel_2008

On 29 November 2009, the citizens of Switzerland voted on a referendum to decide on
a ban to construct new minarets. It was passed with 57% in favour;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swiss_referendum,_November_2009

Whats your take on this? Is this wrong or right? Is this against religious freedom?




Its their country, they have a right to implement such a law especially when it has been voted by the people of the country. They are not banning people from practicing their religion. If in countries like Saudi, Abu Dhabi, Pk, its not allowed to build new temples and churches then how can they expect such privileges in other countries. I have heard of incidents where Hindu's property was destroyed and their idols taken away in Abu Dhabi, but they didn't make any hue and cry coz it is a muslim country and there is a ban on Hindu temples.

In short, everybody should have a right to practice their religion but in private.

Roadrunnerz thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#8
what about china? Do people there have a rite to even practice their religion in privacy?
Bartz thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#9

Originally posted by: crazy_sunny

what about china? Do people there have a rite to even practice their religion in privacy?



When it comes to China we can't say for sure, what happens inside China, we can only speculate based on state sponsored info available to us.

https://www.cfr.org/publication/16272/religion_in_china.html#p2

Freedom and Regulation

Article 36 of the Chinese constitution says that Chinese citizens "enjoy freedom of religious belief." It bans discrimination based on religion, and it forbids state organs, public organizations, or individuals from compelling citizens to believe in—or not to believe in—any particular faith. In 2005, the State Council passed new Regulations on Religious Affairs, which allow religious organizations to possess property, publish literature, train and approve clergy, and collect donations as long as they have registered with the state. According to Chinese criminal law, officials who deny citizens of their right to religious belief can be sentenced up to two years in prison.

But religious freedom is still not universal in China. The state only recognizes five official religions—Buddhism, Taoism, Islam, Catholicism, and Protestantism—and considers the practice of any other faith illegal. Religious organizations are required to register with one of five state-sanctioned patriotic religious associations, each of which is supervised by the State Administration for Religious Affairs (SARA). Religious groups that fail to affiliate with one of the five official religions are denied legal protection under Chinese law.





Roadrunnerz thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#10
official religion ! what next ? China is a very secretive nation. Very little news filters out unlike most other nations. May B it has something to hide 🤔

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".