Rani's confusing role. - Page 3

Originally posted by: priya.nair

Rani's role is the similiar as mithuns role in DID..I think they just brought her to be in the same par as DID... she just is to add to the celebrity aspect and trp of the show . And also to the scores in the same way. but to make her feel special she is given the rights to declare the man of the match in addition to the extra point she can give..

Its true that Shiamak got the worst role when he should have been given the best. ya sunshine he is the moderator but then u need to have the moderator to have rights too na,,,for instance instead of him just hitting the red and green button he should have been given the power to overwrite atleast one of the scores if he felt was wrong. In this role he is able to make some impact We have seen some choreographers have lstend to him like pappu and malu and change scores. They really acknowledge what they have missed like zeroso shaimaks role has had meaning. On the same hand his reasoning was good when he told howard too that his score was wrong and high but howard refused to listen to him. Now that felt like a slap on Shiamak;'s . I am not saying you have to listen hundred percent but when one other team did change then it should be some sense he said and howard should have also done the same.

Shiamak the Guru of Contemporary Dance in India should be given more powers on the Show. Coaches can give their decisions but Shiamak being the Umpire should have the powers of Changing their decisions as he is the only person on the show is is NOT biased.