An insult to the actors: Sagars Luv-Kush - Page 2

Frnds, I had just came out without watching today's episode. kush had become slave to one washerman and Luv was attracted to adore kingdom. What nonsense are they showing?
Frnds I am very very sorry for my language. Do either of you agree that it is a part of Ramayan?
Do u really think that either Kush or Luv being brought up by Sita mata will go for luxurious life? From today onwards, I am going to follow only written update. When they come into right track, then on that day I will again start watching. I once again apologize for my harsh behaviour. But this is too much and I can't bear it any more.
I am a great disciple of Sita Ram who I always remember in every stages of life. I can't tolerate any more.
Sorry friends. Bye.

even now i m also appalled by the way the stories r shown

Originally posted by: Khalrika

Juhi, I am enjoying the stories of Luv-Kush too. This is the serious Khalrika talking now. They should have shown the stories in a mature way with the rakshas being more sophisticated instead of buffons. I feel sorry for the actor in the weird bird rakshas dress because people r probably laughing at him now.
They had Jambavan wear a similar kind of dress. But, when I see Jambavan I don't feel like laughing because the make-up and dress were all very well done.

If they want to show rakshas in Luv-Kush stories then the rakshas should be shown like the rakshas in Ramji's vanvas and the rakshas in Lanka. Instead they made the Luv-Kush rakshas into circus clowns and that has made this Ramayan third rate. I wish the Sagars don't forget that this is still Ramayan, a sacred text and it should be handled with seriousness; no matter which version they follow or which stories they show as part of Ramayan.