terence ristrict his opinion

Originally posted by: ~prettyinpink~

Awwhh he's really sweet but he needs to quit sugar coating his comments.

Originally posted by: ilutl

this is my observation that with the starting of public voting, terence has ristricted his opinion. before that he always used to give his comments in details with positive and negetive points of each participants. but after that he limits his comments and also most of the time he praised all the participant's performance. (no matter its good or bad).

i think he knows that in public voting there is no much value of judges opinion. as most of the time public vote not on the based of performance but on the emotions and region and religion based.

Originally posted by: anjalibc

No , he wants to criticise but Mithun Chakraborty stops him from saying negatives and tells him all the time you are hard task master etc. etc. So he stopped saying , may be he got the hint from Mithun that it may affect voting by public . So he stopped finding faults and if we observe properly and listen to the way and the words commented by each mentors we can understand whether they are very happy, good or not etc.

Mostly when the performance is not 100% their comments would be like you look beautiful, good energy level and there they end the comments. They do not say bad things at all now onwards, all the masters not only Terrence because it amy affect the public judgement and voting thereby

Originally posted by: cynical

i agree with yu, but i feel the judges SHOULD be there to guide the janta and not just be mere spectators. Their insightful comments can help a non-dancer watching the show in making their opinion who was a good dancer and who was't. anyways, i rlly hope judges take their position and give their feedbacks, otherwise i see no point of them sitting there.