PRC grave Afghanistan or Pakistan?

munyr123 thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#1
As I was reading this article (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad_of_Ghor) I read some thing strange in it...
It is written " In some compositions it is stated that Ghori did not kill Prithviraj but rather blinded him. In Ghor province, there exists a grave of Ghori as well as his arch rival Prithiviraj in the same vicinity despite the fact that his actual grave is in modern-day Pakistan."

So Prithvi's grave is in Afghanistan or Pakistan??

Created

Last reply

Replies

26

Views

2.9k

Users

8

Frequent Posters

anasrashid_fan thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#2
i think it is in present day pak only............n ya prc killed ghori by shabdbhedi after he was blinded.
mehraan thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 17 years ago
#3
prc died in afghanistan, bt i think mayb its in thhe present pakistan as kalyani said!
meghaparti thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 17 years ago
#4
Yeah even I have read & heard about this that PRC grave is in Pakistan.....
Twinz thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#5
😕 well that's confusing....
maybe in pak
maria-83 thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#6

Originally posted by: meghaparti

Yeah even I have read & heard about this that PRC grave is in Pakistan.....

but i read prithvi grave in ajmer, becase Gori not killed prithvi, privithi rolled one year under Gori. prithvi killed in 1193
Edited by nicemali - 17 years ago
meghaparti thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 17 years ago
#7
Oh really nice mali I thought after PRC & Chand stabbed each other they were burried there in Pakistan & not in Ajmer....Well thanks for correcting me on my history ...so that means PRC grave is in Ajmer & not Pakistan......
munyr123 thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#8
There isn't grave of Prithvi in Ajmer.
Some time back a petition was posted by some one according to which Prc grave is in Afghanistan and ppl over there are insulting the grave. The petition was to bring back the remains of prc from Afghanistan to India. So theres confusion abt Prc's grave...If it is in Pak then at which place n how is it?
meghaparti thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 17 years ago
#9
Well may be Lakshmi can answer this question better or even nicemali can clarify more on this munyr
maria-83 thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#10
prithvi was lived ofter 1192 ,prithvi killed in 1193
https://www.ajmeronweb.netfirms.com/home_vaj.html
https://www.ajmeronweb.netfirms.com/home_vaj.html
https://www.asiaexcursions.com/rajasthan/ajmer.htm
The most popular accounts about Prithviraj were written centuries later by a Muslim (the book Gulshan-i-Ibrahimi by Ferishta) and by a Hindu (the book Prithviraj Raso by Chand Bardai). Both of these are full of exaggerations and myth.

According to Ferishta Prithviraj had an army of 300,000 cavalry (!), 3000 elephants (!), and innumerable infantry (what could be more innumerable after 300,000 horsemen? The entire population of the Kingdom of Ajmer?). Later Rajput Kingdoms (when cavalry had become the most important formation in the army) of a similar large size had at the most 20,000 cavalry. By this comparison Prithviraj could not have had more than 10,000 horsemen.

Chand Bardai states that after the first Battle of Tarain Prithviraj fell in love with, carried away, and married Sanyogita, daughter of Jaychand Rathor of Kannuaj. His love for her caused the defeat in the second battle, which is not borne out by the facts related above. According to contemporary literature, inscriptions, and coins the rulers of Kannauj were Gahadvals…the Rathors of Badaun were their tributaries. There is no record of a conflict between Ajmer and Kannauj for the simple reason that they did not have a common border.

Tarain I was fought in early 1191, for thirteen months after this Prithviraj was busy in the siege of Sarhind (early 1192); Tarain II was fought only a few months later. When did Prithviraj have the time to correspond with a princess, admit his love to her, and make arrangements to carry her away from a place hundreds of miles in the east[9]?

The more contemporary, and accurate, account is the Prithviraj-vijay written by Jayank. This man was a Kashmiri who had settled down in Ajmer and was a poet in Prithviraj's court. The names of the Chauhan Kingdom's ministers and generals are given here—interestingly one of these generals, named Udayraj, was from Bengal. The Prithviraj-vijay also describes the early communications between Ghori and the Chauhans, and the advice given to Prithviraj by the minister Kadambvas.

There are two other books that mention these events in passing. The Prabandha-chintamani by Merutunga Acharya claims that Prithviraj was taken prisoner but was restored to the throne of Ajmer by Ghori. On a visit to Ajmer the Turk chief happened to see a wall painting in the palace that showed the Muslim soldiers being crushed by a charging horde of wild boar[8]. The humiliated Ghori had Prithviraj killed.

The Viruddhavidhi-vidhvamsa by Laksmidhar describes the absence of the main Chauhan general Skanda in another battle (the enemy is not described). But it goes on to say that Prithviraj was killed by the Turushkas[10] and his brother, the Rajaputra Hariraj became King.

The Hammir-Mahakavya of Nayachandra Suri is a later work but it was written on commission from the Chauhans of Ranthambhor (who will be described in later posts). It has many internal details of the Chauhan clan but exaggerates Prithviraj's victory (it claims several victories) over Ghori by describing the repeated capture and release of the Turk chief. The Hammir-Mahakavya also claims that Prithviraj was taken prisoner but to Delhi—the Bengali general Udayraj attacked Delhi to rescue his master but Prithviraj died in captivity and Udayraj was killed in battle. This work confirms that the Rajaputra Hariraj became the next King of Ajmer.

[1] Original pronunciation is Chahaman.
[2] Originally Sakambhari, the town is near a salt lake of the same name. In those days it was a wealthy city located on important trade routes.
[3] Literally King's (Raja) son (putra). The history of this word and its modification into Rajput will be described in another post.
[4] Meru is a Sanskrit word for hill. Sumeru was the good or blessed (Su) hill (meru) of the Vedas.
[5] Known in those times as Dhillika. After its capture by Muslims it was also called Yoginipura, the city of witches.
[6] According to the Prithviraj-raso Kangra and its mountain chiefs were allies of the Tomars of Delhi.
[7] The Muslim historians call this place Tabarhind or Tarrhind.
[8] The wild boar is regarded as the bravest animal in Rajasthani lore.
[9] The Prithviraj Raso in complete departure from all other accounts states that the Chauhan King was taken to Ghazni. When he refused to lower his eyes in front of Shihab-ud-din the latter had him blinded. While demonstrating his skill in archery the blind Hindu King shot an arrow into the throat of Muhammad Ghori and killed him. After this the author of the Raso and Prithviraj killed each other.
[10] The ancient word for the Turks. According to Indian tradition one of the sons of Bharat, named Turvasu, had migrated to Central Asia and his descendants (Turvasu-ka) became the Turks. This remains mere conjecture and speculation since there is no material evidence to back this story—somewhat similar to the speculations of the Aryan Theory.
Edited by nicemali - 17 years ago

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".