Originally posted by: SuhaanalovesGHT
Parth had crossed all the limits of evilness, there was no scope for him to return, he kept on defending himself for his heinous acts, misogyny and male chauvinism. He even questioned his mother for her loyalty towards karan and accused her n tulsi of lying about MR to justify his wrond deeds. What Nandini did was correct n fully justified, killing him was the only option just like Tulsi had. Shooting him on leg or arms would have not solved the problem, parth would have recovered or even got bailed on the account of injury and he would tortured the viranis n vaishnavi. Nandini even wanted to confess the crime but tulsi didnt let her do...In balaji shows, promises are never broken and for this reason nandini is tight-lipped. She is helpless which is evident, now trollers will fail to understand the logic and only bash the characters to satisfy their eg*. Continue.
I am not blaming Nandani..
I am just saying it was not self defence
It was a well deserved punishment to Parth given by Nandani. And Nandani is justified morally, but legally it can't be called self defence

71