Originally posted by: Viswasruti
Some 25 MLAs from AIADMK have openly stated that they are ready to support Vijay. Reports say they even met him at the resort and submitted support letters. So naturally, if such support exists, the constitutional way is to allow the floor test and let the Assembly decide the majority transparently.
Also, I am not writing this as a Vijay fan. I have never watched his movies and I do not have any extraordinary expectations about his political maturity either. My point is purely about constitutional procedure and democratic convention.
Interestingly, when I spoke to some of my Tamil Nadu friends and asked them about this surprising result, they gave a very simple answer. They said people of the state have watched both AIADMK and DMK rule for more than 50 years, and many feel politics has become limited to the same families, their sons, grandsons, and future generations. According to them, people were looking for a change. They also said Vijay has been helping patients, students, and needy people for nearly 15 years through welfare activities, and many voters connected with that image and gave him an opportunity.
Whether one agrees with Vijay politically or not is a different matter. But when people give such a mandate to a new force, democracy demands that the constitutional process should be followed fairly and uniformly.
@ bold - true..many factors contributed to vijay victory
- This time SIR clearly eliminated many fake voters..
- many people who havent voted for years have registered to atleast ensure their names are not completed removed since officials visited every house and made process easy for them.
- Dmk admk ruling and looting state for 50+ years..youngsters wanted to see someone else come to power for long
So many youngsters voted in this election because they wanted someone young,charismatic, easily accessible who will listen to them..Since vijay though not young- his way reaching out to people ,his simple way of talking everything attracted youngsters..so he has won major seats..he made sure people trust him enough
Youngsters voted for vijay and elders for same old dmk -admk which has lead to hung assembly..
I am happy with this verdict actually..i dont care about who comes from where..if he is willing to lead well, do welfare for people, brings enough opportunities for people we all will be glad..if he fails to deliver he wont come back after 5 years..so nothing wrong in giving a try..
Regarding admk support nothing has come from edapadi palaniswamy mouth..other people talking maynot official unless edpadi speaks..stalin has certainly denied joining hands with admk and said we will function as opposition only

312