Shah Rukh Khan and Deepika Padukone- King video leaked page4 - Page 3

Someone obsessed with expressing his/her ever-lasting dislike for me

Originally posted by: erickies

have you ever thought to ask yourself why anyone would despise you so??? Hmmm. And have you ever wondered why almost every user here has you BLOCKED?!? At some point the problem is not all those other users. The problem is just YOU. GET OUT FROM HERE

People tell me when they don't like what I write...and about 10 (or 12?) also have blocked me... so why should I ask myself? I'm open to criticism, I'm just not tolerating a certain kind of language - be it against me or against other members. And I certainly won't tolerate getting insulted, falsly accused and that one blatantly lies about me. But I don't feel the n e e d to get liked by every member, so, no, I don't see me as t h e problem.

I think, a forum is like a small city (or even a village). It is okay not liking everybody. However, I think, one can still try to behave in a civil way.

Combined videos of Deepika and Shah Rukh

https://x.com/FergHassan/status/2050236102213017725/video/1

Please accept my apology... I didn't want to shame you... now, I better understand your point of view

Do you have proof that everything you claim would come from Ranveer's PR? I ask because it is quite easy to just state things one believe to be like that.

As far as I know the relation between SRK and Ranveer, I won't believe one bit of what you wrote relative to them.

https://www.instagram.com/p/DX3KPgoCFWy/

Originally posted by: HalkatKween

I forgive you. If you are a SRK fan you should already be aware of Ranveer's crazy PR against him. After Padmaavat/Simba/Gully Boy, Ranveer was attacking SRK and claiming he was the top actor of the country and SRK was over. After Dhurandhar, his PR has been attacking SRK and King again. Ranbir is constantly attacked by Ranveer's PR. Alia is constantly attacked by Ranveer's PR. Even Deepika never gets any support by her own husband whenever she's in a controversy. He stays silent. Ranveer is the insecure one constantly picking fights with bigger stars and better actors to remain relevant. Animal fans never compared Animal's success to Ranveer. Dhurandhar fans are always comparing Ranveer to Ranbir or SRK.

Now tell me who has the overactive PR.

What is wrong if he does Condom's ad? he doing it to spread social message. better than doing panmasala ads.

btw I like both actors- I like Ranveer but Srk is Special for me.

Clochette is a female,not a male.

is your DP from leaked photos of King?

i request people to not engage in conversation with HalkatKween, this is the same flameofdarkness who is now trying to act like they are a srk and deepika fan, i mean just look at their display pic, that in itself shows what they are trying to do. And as you can see, they are doing the same personal attacks on members

this flameofdarkness is constantly making new IDs to try to spread hatred towards ranveer and deepika, especially ranveer.

Just report their personal attacks

Originally posted by: Clochette

Just coming into my mind: can those pics get used to make AI-generated pics?...

Just reiterating my question as I think that the pic whith Deepika reading the script is AI made...

Everyone can believe what one wants, dear

At the moment, Ranveer indeed is the 'king' of boxoffice. However SRK is in no way a competitor to SRK who definitely is in a league of his own.

What I know of both, there are nevertheless similarities in their kind of working with others (which I like), especially also with people not acting in the movie but working on the sets... a kind of demeanour quite recommendable.

As for Ranveer doing sometimes things others perceive as naughty or inappropriate... well, SRK did his share himself in the past (). (Well, the one who made the kiss AI pic also did something that isn't quite correct - maybe just wishful thinking... yet ).

I won't deny that the PR of an actor/actress can make publish things they should not... however I won't attribute everything to a PR as whatever 'sources' can give so-called 'scoops' to get published so that gullible people believe it. That's why I only would point the finger to someone if I know it.

Edit: Even though one may dislike what another member wrote, I don't find it ok to call that member a "pig"...