I doubt on the custody thing... as in it may not go legal route... there are no logical explanations to the situation... 😆😆😆
But as of today the custody or rather the conflict will be between DK and Vik rather than DM and Vik.
Everyone has told Vik how his decision affected Mannat... he regrets that though doesnt understand the full impact... I feel it will be more of DK and Vik... Mannat ko sideline karenge dono bhai and khud hi ladd padenge. 😅😅😅
I am low key excited for custody track though 🤣🤣🤣 Rather than anyone else I want to see what story are they going to weave for Dua ... 😜😜😜.
How to explain biological process 😄😄😄
Roch keeps saying that if anyone has right to question DK its Vik... and he hasnt dont that 🤣🤣🤣. DK ne aaj ye warning na dii hoti to Vik ko indebtedness feel hota for DK ... ab nahi hoga 😜
I’m not sure how the writers will turn this around, but if we look at it purely from a legal standpoint, things get complicated.
Mannat and Vik’s marriage was never fully completed in a conventional sense, and it’s unclear how valid the divorce is. Dua was conceived before the marriage, and given that Mannat was abandoned, she had a reasonable basis for keeping the child away. A judge isn’t going to factor in emotional misunderstandings—they will focus strictly on verifiable evidence.
Right now, DK and Mannat are cohabiting. Whether they share a conjugal relationship is legally irrelevant. Courts increasingly recognize live-in relationships, and children raised in such arrangements are not treated differently. While DK may not have been able to adopt Dua as a single parent initially, the fact that he has been living with Mannat and raising Dua could weigh in his favor from a humanitarian standpoint.
Legally, Mannat, as the biological mother, holds primary rights over Dua. She ultimately decides who is part of the child’s life. As discussed before, adoption—when formalized—carries the same legal weight as biological parenthood. So if DK has legally adopted Dua, his position is strong. If not, his claim becomes more dependent on demonstrating a consistent caregiving role.
This makes it less of a strictly legal battle and more of a moral one. Legally, DK might have a stronger case if he can establish parental responsibility. But morally, the situation is driven by past misunderstandings, which only Mannat can truly resolve. Courts don’t rule on emotions—they rely on documented facts like marriage, custody, and caregiving history.
Given that Mannat and Vik’s marriage appears to have broken down significantly—and possibly in ways that could be substantiated—it’s unclear why a court would favor Vik, especially if abandonment can be demonstrated.
In the end, the legal system will look at stability, continuity of care, and the child’s best interests. And on those grounds, Mannat’s decision will likely carry the most weight.
PS: Refined with AI. :D
Anupamaa
1.4k