Originally posted by: hasini009
“From the debates of Adi Shankaracharya to the spiritual humanism of Swami Vivekananda, the essence of Hindu thought has always been dialogue, not diktat. It has thrived on plurality.”
We are not living in Adi Shankaracharya and Swami Vivekananda era.
traditional Hindu values of tolerance, patience and dialogues have been misunderstood as weakness, leading to a "mental and physical onslaught" on the community.
Why should only Hindus carry the burden of being tolerant, and that this tolerance is not reciprocated by other communities?
Also ..tolerance costed us 1000 years..bharat was enslaved due to this passiveness & now they come & say bharat is their country too..f it yaar ...tell me any part of the world where ppl from diff religions live together peacefully ..usa ?? Lol..there are divides amongst muslims too ..is 1000 years history so easy to erase ?
So the other community can show some tolerance , they will know how it feels to be on the other side ..follow the gandhian principle ..how many are tolerant here?
Anyways everyone here is mixing up thr core issue of terrorism, extremism with religious divide ..face the truth, they need to change their ideology..
Edited by Krinya - 12 hours ago
8