Global Alert: US–Israel's Major Military Operations against Iran🔥#2 - Page 73

Originally posted by: Cynical1

So women are not only treated as inferior but even her mother and cousin aren’t supposed to be able to be a woman’s protectors ?

Women are really considered so inferior is extremely sad.

Did I tell you that when I was out a few days ago in my shorts and Tshirt with a lot of water in my hand - I couldn’t handle the heat. Right by me, 2 women walked by in head to toe burqa. I was feeling so sorry for their plight. The guys with them were of course not as overly dressed in the severe hot weather.

it’s enforcing all this and far worse in Iran that has made them an Islamic extremist regime and hence the war.

Women in Islam are regarded as spiritually equal to men, with recognized rights to education, property ownership, marriage consent, and inheritance, established by the Quran. While cultural practices vary widely, Islamic teachings emphasize a balanced, often complementary role within family and society, where mothers and women are highly honored.

Iran is btw very strict in enforcing hijab but other countries are lenient. Some don't do but some practice as per there wish.

For eg: I don't, but my little sister does, and we got the same teachings from our parents, so it's individual perception.

Originally posted by: xnbstar

Nothing is making women inferior here. It is all about the safety and protection. But yeah, everyone can perceived differently. It is fine.

Secondly, this is what it is. If you don't believe then don't challenge please. I am not someone who has extensive and thorough research in this matter.

I am not challenging. I am processing what you write and asking questions.

It seems the rules for women make them inferior. Even words like needing protection and needing safety. Why don’t men need safety and protection ?

It’s not a question of my beliefs tbh. Aren’t you a CS grad? So you know it’s not belief but logic that runs the world. Can you declare a computer you make as the safest in the world because you decree it to be ? I am asking the same thing here- far from challenging. Your responses help me better understand or ask more questions.

In fact another user insisted that we should have dialogues so that we can be reformists of others thinking and be harbingers of removal of Islamic extremism and terrorism.

Former High Commissioner to India, Abdul Basit- File image- PTI

‘We’ll bomb Delhi, Mumbai if US targets our nukes’: Pakistan’s former envoy to IndiaFP News Desk • March 22, 2026, 09:00:09????

Basit, who served as Islamabad’s top diplomat in New Delhi from 2014 to 2017 framed India as Pakistan’s “default” target in a worst-case scenario where the US targets its nuclear assets.

As tensions in West Asia intensify amid the ongoing Iran war involving the United States and Israel, a controversial statement by former Pakistan High Commissioner to India Abdul Basit has raised fresh concerns about regional security.

Speaking about a hypothetical worst-case scenario, Basit, who served as Islamabad’s top diplomat in New Delhi from 2014 to 2017, suggested that Pakistan could strike India if faced with an existential military threat from the US or Israel.

Originally posted by: xnbstar

My argument there is, what's the actual purpose of fighting? Why can't mutual agreement or reconciliation be possible?

No, it's not all right to fight at all. The best way to tackle arguments is to listen carefully, understand each other's points, and find a mutual solution.

Ghar me bhi to siblings me jhagra hojata hai but iska ye matlab nahi apas me ek doosrey ko marey. Our parents always try to resolve issues, so bas jo countries ke conflict hain that needs to be solved. Ukraine and Russia, both are non-Muslim countries but fighting too. China vs Taiwan alag side per, dunya ka koi kona clear nahi.

That indicates har koi dunya me bas lad raha hai.

I hope you listen to me carefully. A lot of times you bring religion into your discussions but accuse us of doing so.

For eg your immediate reply was why they bombing each other when they have same religion. we never brought up religion.

And then just yesterday you accused us all and said this was all about religion and extremism / terrorism is an excuse.

Do you think the problem is what is running in your head and how you are perceiving / reading things if everything begins and ends with religion.

It is something you must think about as your reply above clearly is different and states the obvious , what is the reason for anyone to bomb a hospital regardless of each others religion.

I feel once you accept this, you might be better able to appreciate the global fight against Islamic extremism and terrorism and we need every able body and mind in this effort without regards to their own religion. It’s a universal fight.

Originally posted by: Viswasruti

Former High Commissioner to India, Abdul Basit- File image- PTI

‘We’ll bomb Delhi, Mumbai if US targets our nukes’: Pakistan’s former envoy to IndiaFP News Desk • March 22, 2026, 09:00:09????

Basit, who served as Islamabad’s top diplomat in New Delhi from 2014 to 2017 framed India as Pakistan’s “default” target in a worst-case scenario where the US targets its nuclear assets.

As tensions in West Asia intensify amid the ongoing Iran war involving the United States and Israel, a controversial statement by former Pakistan High Commissioner to India Abdul Basit has raised fresh concerns about regional security.

Speaking about a hypothetical worst-case scenario, Basit, who served as Islamabad’s top diplomat in New Delhi from 2014 to 2017, suggested that Pakistan could strike India if faced with an existential military threat from the US or Israel.

Matlab US se panga lene ki himmat nhi hai to India ko attack kar denge?? Ye badi achhi baat kahi

Originally posted by: Viswasruti

Former High Commissioner to India, Abdul Basit- File image- PTI

‘We’ll bomb Delhi, Mumbai if US targets our nukes’: Pakistan’s former envoy to IndiaFP News Desk • March 22, 2026, 09:00:09????

Basit, who served as Islamabad’s top diplomat in New Delhi from 2014 to 2017 framed India as Pakistan’s “default” target in a worst-case scenario where the US targets its nuclear assets.

As tensions in West Asia intensify amid the ongoing Iran war involving the United States and Israel, a controversial statement by former Pakistan High Commissioner to India Abdul Basit has raised fresh concerns about regional security.

Speaking about a hypothetical worst-case scenario, Basit, who served as Islamabad’s top diplomat in New Delhi from 2014 to 2017, suggested that Pakistan could strike India if faced with an existential military threat from the US or Israel.

Ty for posting this. I did put it up yesterday with the video as well so that there was no question on its validity.

Now this helps solve my rhetoric on why Pakistan is long overdue to pay for its karma. Not just because of what US DNI said but just look at their latest above. They have just one goal - anhilltate India with any excuse they can find.

Let’s see what they do when the water shortages start.

Originally posted by: Cynical1

I am not challenging. I am processing what you write and asking questions.

It seems the rules for women make them inferior. Even words like needing protection and needing safety. Why don’t men need safety and protection ?

It’s not a question of my beliefs tbh. Aren’t you a CS grad? So you know it’s not belief but logic that runs the world. Can you declare a computer you make as the safest in the world because you decree it to be ? I am asking the same thing here- far from challenging. Your responses help me better understand or ask more questions.

In fact another user insisted that we should have dialogues so that we can be reformists of others thinking and be harbingers of removal of Islamic extremism and terrorism.

I like the way you're asking logical questions 👏 While researching about the logical reasoning, even my knowledge is increasing.

Islam seeks to protect the honor and dignity of women through Sacred Law. Men, in general, are physically stronger than women and can defend themselves against assault (to varying degrees).

In Islamic teachings:

Men are assigned the role of protector and provider (qawwam).

Women are given the right to receive protection (from father, husband, family).

So it’s not that Men don’t need protection instead Men are responsible for protection, both their own and others’

Another important factor of getting them assigned as guardians:

Men were expected to handle risk (travel, trade, war). Furthermore, they had more mobility and authority in society. Most significantly, physical strength differences were considered in assigning roles. Because of that, they weren’t placed under a system like mahram.

Also, nothing physical distinguishes one group’s superiority over the other in this world. Only righteousness and piety make us ‘better’ by Allah. Allah says: “Oh humankind, indeed We have created you from male and female and made you peoples and tribes that you may know one another. Indeed, the noblest of you in the sight of Allah is the most righteous of you. Indeed, Allah is Knowing and Acquainted.” [Quran, 49:13]

Originally posted by: xnbstar

Women in Islam are regarded as spiritually equal to men, with recognized rights to education, property ownership, marriage consent, and inheritance, established by the Quran. While cultural practices vary widely, Islamic teachings emphasize a balanced, often complementary role within family and society, where mothers and women are highly honored.

Iran is btw very strict in enforcing hijab but other countries are lenient. Some don't do but some practice as per there wish.

For eg: I don't, but my little sister does, and we got the same teachings from our parents, so it's individual perception.

Spiritually equal but physically treated different = treating them inferior.

I am glad you have chosen a path with freedom of expression and not what some people dictate such as burqa.

We will talk later. I have to rush now.

May peace and prosperity be the future that defines humanity

Originally posted by: Cynical1

I hope you listen to me carefully. A lot of times you bring religion into your discussions but accuse us of doing so.

For eg your immediate reply was why they bombing each other when they have same religion. we never brought up religion.

And then just yesterday you accused us all and said this was all about religion and extremism / terrorism is an excuse.

Do you think the problem is what is running in your head and how you are perceiving / reading things if everything begins and ends with religion.

It is something you must think about as your reply above clearly is different and states the obvious , what is the reason for anyone to bomb a hospital regardless of each others religion.

I feel once you accept this, you might be better able to appreciate the global fight against Islamic extremism and terrorism and we need every able body and mind in this effort without regards to their own religion. It’s a universal fight.

This is from my perspective since we believe in brotherhood concept so fighting with seems not good. I was even baffled as I am not even aware about the actual reasoning. And yes, I said already in other groups, that this bombing to schools or any wrongdoings are unethical and barbaric. So, don't worry, extreme punishment will come for Pakistan too because wrong is wrong.

When the world is already burning, adding some more fire is not strength; it is a failure of wisdom. Power that provokes war may win moments, but only peace can win generations.

Every crisis born from war steals a little more of our normal life, leaving behind uncertainty and quiet sorrow.

Yet even in these times, hope persists, that one day peace will return, and the world will feel like home again.