Well, I got what y o u mean by calling you "Charlie Hebdo"... that doesn't mean that you have real knowledge about what this magazine that exists since more than 50 years really stands for... obviously not. You just took a catchword that came up after what happened in Jan 2015...
In this thread (and the former one), you gave me the impression of a quite one-dimensionally focussed person which the makers of the magazine never had been. My impression may be wrong although I found just one post of you I could give a
to the whole content (which - of course - is my 'fault' , not yours - you're completely entitled to all of your opinions
).
I don't know the news anchors personally, so should I stop consuming news... Or if we don't know the scientist, should we stop benefiting from their inventions ?? The only way to challenge current narratives / facts is to put forth counter facts.. Either they pass the test of logic, resonate with the lived realities of people or they fail.. In either case it's only mature to not call people gullible in case of disagreements ... That's lazy and underestimates other person's intelligence...




1.4k