Mannat Har Khushi Paane Ki: Episode Discussion Thread - 39 - Page 95

Originally posted by: nutmeg7

Vikrant ki nazar mei yeh apne bade bhai Dhairya ki wife hai naa...

Toh yeh apne "bhabhi" ke piche kyu pada hai

https://x.com/santoshi1905/status/2025847554198622567

Well DK is having an extra marital affair with Vikrant's wife. He never divorced her

If you watch this show looking for logic or with an eye of moral police you will die a thousand deaths

Anyway what is one to do when "bhabhi" has come to his room uninvited 🤣🤣🤣Might as well check the settings to understand reason for the visit

Originally posted by: nutmeg7

Vikrant ki nazar mei yeh apne bade bhai Dhairya ki wife hai naa...

Toh yeh apne "bhabhi" ke piche kyu pada hai

https://x.com/santoshi1905/status/2025847554198622567

Saare V ek jaise hote hai it seems

Originally posted by: Bettyscar

Well DK is having an extra marital affair with Vikrant's wife. He never divorced her

If you watch this show looking for logic or with an eye of moral police you will die a thousand deaths

Anyway what is one to do when "bhabhi" has come to his room uninvited 🤣🤣🤣Might as well check the settings to understand reason for the visit

Aashiq Vikku ji is also practicing Bigamy by the way.

🤣🤣🤣🤣

Originally posted by: Moor278

bold... I refrain from making judgements based on BTS and episodes... if I have those must been an unintentional.

Red and blue ... dont downplay the situations regarding Mannat and Vikrant. The only time when Mannat wholeheartedly forgave Aish was when she saved her from goon attack in Mezbani and lets be honest that was an actual save since Aish realized it will fall back on her and Malla. So even if we assume Aish had selfish motives, she did actually save Mannat in that situation. The situation was so carefully planned and executed by Aish that it did make some sense why Mannat believes Aish helped her. You cant deny that.

at all other times, Mannat has been suspicious of her... she had kept records and she made sure Aish gets punished.

Whereas the only direct attack Vik has faced so far is the molestation attempt by Malla... something she and Aish accepted on their own.

Nobody knows about the DH attack which Mannat wanted to investigate and was not allowed to.

That's why I say the audience supports or understands Mannats POV because it is well written or at least has some logical base.

Viks doesnt... he not only forgave her for the ONS but he lets her meddle in his life... there's still no sense why he thinks Malla reformed when she was at the forefront of the skit which triggered him and she was supporting Vish all along in putting the entire blame on Mannat.

I have supported Vik when the situation was not written in his favour and his reactions were justifiable.

I supported Vik when he couldnt believe Bobby would so such a nasty crime.

I supported him when he married Malla because of how she presented him the ONS. I remember my justification of why he feels he could have done it because she took the blame on herself and he was too drunk to understand.

I supported Vik during the wedding kaand because he was a proof of himself... and I still do.... there can be no greater proof than Viks own memories. In that situation, he deserved sympathy and understanding because his memories validated what vish was saying and it was written that way....

I do not belong to that audience who bash Vikrant unnecessarily. But i will not hold back my frustration when he doesnt behave the way we were told he is supposed to. He is supposed to be Mannats BDB, protecting her not fighting with her.

Green... sorry to say but post leap and especially post Indore, I have not seen you supporting Mannat as vociferously as you do vikrant. And I hate to bring it up but its also true that you dont like DK and you judge Mannats behaviour from her association to DK... her words and her behaviour is dissected too much while Vik gets a free pass in name of trauma. Is he the only one in trauma? For that matter, even RoTu are in trauma.... I dont remember anything in their support.

If they get blamed for their mistakes pre leap and the life they have now as what they deserve how is it that Vik shouldn't own up to his mistakes???? why shouldnt he suffer alone for his mistakes? Why does he gets sympathy but RoTu and Mannat dont when their trauma is equally valid and disturbing.

Purple and blue... Thats the only thing I agree.... Mannat is a victim... but she is victim of Vikrant more than RoTu... she has suffered the worst possible brunt of his anger and is still suffering it with no sign of relief in future... all because she wanted to protect him from a trauma she herself went through.

Was that one lie big enough to let go of everything else? Is that lie and whatever betrayal Vik feels warrants such a disgusting behaviour from Vik???

Are the situations even comparable????

Just look at the situation in yesterdays episode ... Mannat gracefully and sensibly accepted Vikrants new life... congratulated him for his engagement and wished him well and what has Vikrant done ever since he has met her?

She too feels betrayed as much as he does.... but isn't there a difference in how they both approached the situation? One with maturity and the other with complete insensitivity????

So how does my gender matter when that's the picture I am seeing on my screen....

All I am asking is Vik to show some growth and understanding and it shouldn't happen because someone told him something. It has to be independent of anyone's influence.

Is there is logic to him accepting Ys proposal? Who is he going to blame this time? and does he really plan to move on with Y? if yes... why hurt Mannat?

My frustration is with writing of the character and credit to Adnan for making it watchable... but I cant defend him simply because he is ML.

As I said, I draw the line at repeated CAs

I will repeat something I said long back " you lie, you deceive someone, you do not have the the right to chose how the other person reacts , similar to, you light a fire , you cannot control the fire after a point since this wasn't a harmless lie". We can claim all we want it's a lie for Vikrant benefit and does she deserve this punishment , we can't deny the fact that lie caused this destruction.

And , again Mannat should have stayed clear instead of falling for EB of RoTu and DK , just like how we expect Vikrant's priority should be Mannat, Mannat's should have been Vikrant. Which the makers aren't even focusing on.

Again I have multiple times critized the writers and the lack of good writing. This doesn't take away the fact , The scenes which I mentioned showcase how audience reacts to situations based on gender for similar scenes such as lying, for giving. We can agree to disagree.

Bold - are they twins that they will react the same way ? . Does Mannat feel there is a betrayal or does Vikrant feel there is a betrayal? Is Vikrant the one standing with his brothers ex claiming they have a kid infront of Mannat? The scenes Mannat and Vikrant are seeing and perceiving are different, there reactions will be different.

I don't have to defend Mannat much since leap because Mannat is automatically absolved of everything /anything because she has Dua. If she didn't I would come running to defend her as well, now I just need to write a sentence or two in her defense and 1 word against Mannat to trigger the forum. Regarding Vikrant, all I see is pages and pages of bashing, name calling even if he just breathes and reacts to what he is seeing right infornt of him. We expect Vikrant to act like a saint, recertify his mistake which he isn't aware off. This has nothing to do with writing just how audience perceives.

No, I don't say Vikrant or Mannat writing is great and that wasn't my intention of the post as I said. I only highlighted similar scenes for debate purposes & audience reaction to these scenes.

At the end we will see what they do with ManVik and if both realize their mistakes. I am here only for this 😄

Originally posted by: Bettyscar

After a 3year investment in the relationship this will not end well

Are you dman sure about this 🤣

Originally posted by: Bettyscar

It's been 7years, can't blame the guy. Do you see Mannat's eyes on his lips I wouldn't be surprised if he has cornered her within a few mins of her entering SM.

Which room is this?

Why can't they focus on something concrete story wise instead of these repeat scenes that too when they believe the other is committed

See this perspective of Mannat and Vikrant from AdSha and why they react the way they do

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DVGNquZCCWt/

Can anyone enlighten me why does Vikrant still think Mannat is a gold digger and money minded? Even in bts while blabbering, he is still saying that she isnt here for you, she is here for money when neither of this is true? Did he forget about the deal and his own conditions? Also till now he must have realised why she needed 25 lakhs, still he is at it? Did I miss some chapter where Mannat actually scammed him for money and then ran away to trap richer guy than him, because thats how gold diggers work, unlike Mannat who demoted herself to be with a government worker? Its funny people everywhere are asking for Mannat's redemption but Vikrant repeatedly taking digs at her financial status is something people arent bringing up enough? Then whats the difference between him and Yuvi? The latter is still a kid who can be taught. He is openly classist meanwhile Vikrant's classist attitude is limited to Mannat only.

Originally posted by: Rdigest

I will repeat something I said long back " you lie, you deceive someone, you do not have the the right to chose how the other person reacts , similar to, you light a fire , you cannot control the fire after a point since this wasn't a harmless lie". We can claim all we want it's a lie for Vikrant benefit and does she deserve this punishment , we can't deny the fact that lie caused this destruction.

And , again Mannat should have stayed clear instead of falling for EB of RoTu and DK , just like how we expect Vikrant's priority should be Mannat, Mannat's should have been Vikrant. Which the makers aren't even focusing on.

Again I have multiple times critized the writers and the lack of good writing. This doesn't take away the fact , The scenes which I mentioned showcase how audience reacts to situations based on gender for similar scenes such as lying, for giving. We can agree to disagree.

Bold - are they twins that they will react the same way ? . Does Mannat feel there is a betrayal or does Vikrant feel there is a betrayal? Is Vikrant the one standing with his brothers ex claiming they have a kid infront of Mannat? The scenes Mannat and Vikrant are seeing and perceiving are different, there reactions will be different.

I don't have to defend Mannat much since leap because Mannat is automatically absolved of everything /anything because she has Dua. If she didn't I would come running to defend her as well, now I just need to write a sentence or two in her defense and 1 word against Mannat to trigger the forum. Regarding Vikrant, all I see is pages and pages of bashing, name calling even if he just breathes and reacts to what he is seeing right infornt of him. We expect Vikrant to act like a saint, recertify his mistake which he isn't aware off. This has nothing to do with writing just how audience perceives.

No, I don't say Vikrant or Mannat writing is great and that wasn't my intention of the post as I said. I only highlighted similar scenes for debate purposes & audience reaction to these scenes.

At the end we will see what they do with ManVik and if both realize their mistakes. I am here only for this 😄

What RD!You are on fire Man🔥😈. Wish I can add little bit of Petrol /Ghee from my side but sadly no time😭. Hopefully I can watch episodes and comment.