Originally posted by: Jyotsna09
Did I say anything about her dress or regarding her dress? Why do you jump to conclusions ? Did I ever mention ,M has any wrong intentions ? Depending on the context , I said that they should have been transparent and cautious as they already know Vik ' s thoughts ..Go through my post once again with cool mind..
Bold sorry ..what ?? What this kind of talk ?
This has been a topic of ongoing discussion among many forum members for quite some time. . Do you wish to control them?
How was the female shamed by this? Did I ever mention anything about the shape, size, or appearance of the female?
Google 's help :
Body shaming means expressing mockery or criticism about the shape, size, or appearance of a person's body.
Red.... So are we going to justify this even though Vik thoughts were wrong????
When this happened there was no sign of DK developing feelings... no one thought so...
I deliberately mentioned the dress of other characters because that is the environment Vikrant has grown up with and seen this throughout his life... if he is fine with them why should all of his judgement be reserved for Mannat????
I did not mean body... shame in general for 'side' hugging a guy.... and that too when both DK and Mannat had clarified that there was nothing untoward.
When you add cautious as a word .. it directly implies that the concerned party should exercise caution... in this case Mannat and DK... the onus is on them ... not on the one accusing them
I get the discussion and I am very glad that some of you have been proven right... I was grossly mistaken.... that doesnt mean I cant call out such language when it demeans a woman.
DK is wrong now... we still dont know when his feelings started.... so to look at everything from that lens now is whats not required.
This hug was called out by some instigators when it aired and there was huge support on the forum for Mannat and DK ... and I remember you too had defended it then.
Edited by Moor278 - 5 hours ago
1.5k