I will point out one thing where I go in a different tangent.
Pre-leap they showed Mannat WW Neetu for all her crimes even going against Vikrant and ignoring his trauma. So, I found yesterday's scene a bit over the top where Mannat was threatening the same maa for whom she fought with Vikrant. I felt the scene was not for Mannat's benefit, but was added just to elevate DK further
.
Imagine the dude was arguing with Neetu a moment ago, stopped her, was shocked Neetu defended Vikrant, suddenly starts crying right when Mannat enters, Mannat elevates him to godly status while he stands there crying, he doesn't utter a word or stops Mannat , then when alone with Mannat becomes mahaan by saying Neetu is after all maa and wants to meet Vikrant
and gets more praises & promises from Mannat. What was this scene even meant to convey, DK is Cunning and Mannat is stupid?
The writers are writing these scenes intentionally. Same for Vikrant there is hardly anything for Vikrant character
.
All i know is Mannat is going to get the shock of her life when she realises why DK was doing all this
but i wouldn't be surprised if she is given dialogues that express her understanding.
I don't know if it's still considered sacrificing when one does all these acts because he loves someone.
It's not clear when DK's admiration for Mannat turned into something else but pre-leap he admired Mannat's devotion to Vikrant and love for family and that seemed to make them have something in common.
.
and gets more praises & promises from Mannat. What was this scene even meant to convey, DK is Cunning and Mannat is stupid?
This is mera jaanbujhke wala...so tagging only those who share same to same thoughts


1.5k