Originally posted by: Moor278
Yaar ek hi baat kitni baar likhu main đ¤Śââď¸
It was the intentions....
bold... sach gang didnt want Vik to go through what Mannat has gone through... to be told that your mom sold you for money. You are right when you say they could have told the truth with Dadi as witness... but they didnt... when they were the ones on the right side... why???? Because the truth was much much harsher than the lie. Which they wanted to avoid for Vik.
We can rightfully debate on whether he had the right to know... that doesnt what they did was wrong either.
And as audience we dont know for sure how Vik would have reacted.... he might have left all of them and gone to Vish....
Red is the yardstick wala point i mentione to RD .. if Vik can believe Vish who he knows has lied and has met a few days ago... why cant DK... vo unki bio mom hai... extend the same yardstick for both brothers of trusting the mom đ
Blue... this doesn't have a logical explanation at all... Ronnie was ready to hand over the property which he did... Malla is a certified liar and criminal... extend the same courtesy to DK trusting Vish which you extend for Vik here when you say he believes her because she claims to have reformed.
Did Vik ever wonder how will RoTu steal a grown up man like himself from his biological mother using money power???? A child was helpless ... a man who is capable of earning his own money cant protect his mother????
Kaise bakwas logic hai ye???
And if thats the case why did RoTu and Mannat sign off everything to never claim it back????
At this point in the story... it wasnt identity issue but became a money issue... why has Vik not accepted the Aman Kumar identity when he was so hurt by Salujas???? Up until Ronnie reminded him of that...
The point I have been making past so many days is plainly this.... not every action of Vik can be justified.... and just like you dont expect any growth from Vik until he finds some truth... same goes for the other side.... they know half truths too... DK wont realise how he was played by Aish till he finds out she is alive....
He didnt anticipate that Malla and Vish were capable of pulling that stunt and they aren't even now... it was Aish all together... who is dead for all characters. Malla and Vish were present in SM throughout... so them pulling off a killing is also unbelievable.
Just because Vik cant be justified doesnt mean other side should be pulled down. You cant deny the fact that Vik was influenced more by the fact that Mannat betrayed him with DK and that made him look at everything with a twisted logic... that was his insecurity which was exploited.
When you lot repeat on extending courtesy and understanding for Vik because he doesnt know full truths ... I am asking the same thing for other side.... how is that difficult to understand?????
The yardstick where I differentiate between DK and Vik is Vik and Vik alone should have a growth in his character and not DK. DK is a sidey not ML.
1.5k