Originally posted by: Bettyscar
How many BC are there? Was DK's offer to tear the BC with his name just a figure of speech?
Looks like this BC is what will take them down with the way its being highlighted and we all know Vikrant's anger š¤ š°
Episode Discussions
MAIRA FLIPS 26.1
🏏WPL 2026: Match 16: RCB W vs MI W at Vadodara on 26/01/26🏏
PROOF IN BAG 27.1
Confusion about Parallel Leads 😜 seriously was it Ruhi?
What is this behaviour Maira?
Border 2 is a huge blockbuster
Ameesha Patel Dreaming Of Gadar 3
Noyna's failed attempt to be tripti!
🏏WPL 2026: Match 17: DC W vs GG W at Vadodara on 27/01/26🏏
Song out - AashiqonKiColony - Shahid & Disha - O Romeo
Border 3 Officially Confirmed
Happy Republic Day, forum members!
The Shradhanjali Thread
Ariya OS : Fluttering Hearts 💖💞
Karan Johar Goes On Break From Social Media
Originally posted by: Bettyscar
How many BC are there? Was DK's offer to tear the BC with his name just a figure of speech?
Looks like this BC is what will take them down with the way its being highlighted and we all know Vikrant's anger š¤ š°
Mannat acknowledges Vik as Duaās father at heart yet she also believes that Vik thinks the child belongs to DK. This is reflected in her conversations with both Vik and DK when she talks about ghatiya and bebuniyaad ilzaam. She has a fear that Neetu might reveal the truth that Dua is Vikās daughter and not DKās. Such a revelation would give Vik parental rights even though he had rejected the child earlier according to her and questioned her character. What no one knows is that Vik was never aware of the pregnancy. However, in Mannatās understanding Vik knew she was pregnant but believed the child was DKās, not his. This belief fuels her fear of rejection for herself and for dua because she feels they would once again be subjected to the same questions, doubts, and need for validation. If Neetu or any other vamp exposes duaās truth, it would give Vik the power to claim her and potentially take her away. In his mind, Mannat would appear guilty of hiding the truth and conveniently portraying DK as duaās father and depriving him of his rights without him even pausing to question the circumstances.
This then makes me wonder what's going to make Mannat allow Dua to compete. Any chance she may realise Vikrant doesn't know about Dua? Nothing short of her realising this would make sense for her to venture into enemy territory.
Originally posted by: truptishree
Daman
I will point out one thing here. As per Mannat Vikrant rejected his baby only not DKās.
If you recall their conversation before going to search Shruti. She clearly told DK whatās the use of trying to mend ways? If he is not believing me but photos shown by Vish. Or should I wait if he accuses that this baby is not his but yours and this I will not be able to tolerate. So for Mannat he rejected their baby only and sent Divorce papers so she will not come for property with their kid(MU created by Malla).
Her fear is that he will hurt Dua the same way he hurt her. And her anger at him for rejecting their kid not because he believes kid is DKās.
And see she was even going to send him message about her pregnancy and think for their baby but DK told her to send voice note instead š”. She couldnāt sent it because of Shrutiās deathš¢
And if you recall her dream Vikrant taking Dua away. See deep down she fears that being a father Vikrant does have a right on Dua and he might take her away and she will be all alone š¢.
One more thing her anger at him for thinking that she moved on with DK proving his allegations trueš¢.
Thank you Trupti - I never felt pre-leap Vik went as far in his CA Mannat to think he believed the baby was DKās - he rejected her & his own baby . I couldnāt remember the conversations to back this impression ( as I still havenāt had the heart to watch the episodes) but you have written them well.
Are we sure it's after a year they make BC, shouldn't this be done within 3 months or something in India. I am saying this because they cannot hire such a small baby, so they might have hired a grown up baby for the FB. The intent of the scene atleast I interpreted was to highlight the fact DK is on the BC and Vikrant will go ballistic once he knows Dua is his daughter creating trouble for Mannat for lying on something as critical as BC.
This is just my interpretation, since there was no need to add this scene otherwise.
There were two scenes, Mannat in hospital having just given birth and DK bringing baby to her ā¦.Ronnie comes in at the end saying fathers name is needed for the BC, but then scene cuts off.
Next scene was older crying baby and DK in control with nurse- baby looked 12-18months old at the end of which Mannat tells Ronnie to write DKs name. So clearly a time lapseā¦..and tying in with Mannat suffering postnatal depression.
Betty - that convo of tearing up the BC was odd, he didnāt say anything about Vik being the bio fatherā¦they just talked about their āfriends onlyā relationship - whatās that got to do with the BC?
Originally posted by: Shazia_h
There were two scenes, Mannat in hospital having just given birth and DK bringing baby to her ā¦.Ronnie comes in at the end saying fathers name is needed for the BC, but then scene cuts off.
Next scene was older crying baby and DK in control with nurse- baby looked 12-18months old at the end of which Mannat tells Ronnie to write DKs name. So clearly a time lapseā¦..and tying in with Mannat suffering postnal depression.
Betty - that convo of tearing up the BC was odd, he didnāt say anything about Vik being the bio fatherā¦they just talking about their friends only relationship whatās that got to do with the BC?
Might be possible and I might have just missed something but I am confused about Mannat's post natal depression and where you noticed this.
Are we assuming this because of the little older baby where DK had all those dialogues showing he was caring for the baby which led Mannat to write his name on BC?
Might be possible and I might have just missed something but I am confused about Mannat's post natal depression and where you noticed this.
Are we assuming this because of the little older baby where DK had all those dialogues showing he was caring for the baby which led Mannat to write his name on BC?
Yes - in that scene Mannat seemed overwhelmed with the unsettled babyā¦and DK talked about the older babyās full routine, including feed times etc which he can only know if he was involved in night feeds too. If they arenāt a married couple Mannat mustnāt have been able to cope to need help with night feeds?
Iām going to watch the segment again in a while.
Originally posted by: Shazia_h
Yes - in that scene Mannat seemed overwhelmed with the unsettled babyā¦and DK talked about the older babyās full routine, including feed times etc which he can only know if he was involved in night feeds too. If they arenāt a married couple Mannat mustnāt have been able to cope to need help with night feeds?
Iām going to watch the segment again in a while.
You confused me further Shazia, so you are saying they got married aswell ?
The way I interpreted the scene was to show how they got DK's name on BC which might play a role in future track is what I was thinking especially with that weird, I will tear the BC dialogue š¤
This writing & episodes should come with "To each of their own" , "whoever it's concerned" & "open interpretation" warnings
WRITTEN UPDATES AND DAILY DISCUSSION THREAD NO 37 Welcome to Mannat - Har Khushi Paane Ki EDT
Welcome to BTS Thread of MHKPK...
Welcome to Chat Corner for Mannat forum We can do gupshup here
Permission given by Leprechaun
WRITTEN UPDATES AND DAILY DISCUSSION THREAD NO 36 Welcome to Mannat - Har Khushi Paane Ki EDT
1.5k