Originally posted by: annjose1998
If they divide the property (which probably won’t happen lol) but hypothetically lol if they do.. what about the Poddar firm??? I mean it’s under Krish’s name (through cheating) and not just Sanjay but doesn’t Manoj, Armaan, Daksh (via Rohit) and even Abhira have a share in it too??? Because they have all worked for that firm and made it grow. So is Krish gonna give it back to Kaveri so everything can be evenly split- because I don’t think he is gonna be willing to do that…. So sure Kajal can ask for her share in the property, which she and her kids have fully right in, but her son and husband did cheat her mother and her her out to get the property and firm in their hands and Krish to this day has no remorse about it. And he still has the firm in his name.
Somebody needs to slap sense into Vidhya lol. Who is she going around slapping people.. and that to Kajal for something she does’t even know about.. If Tanya is at fault, yell at her…. Just because Kajal encourages Tanya to be successful, suddenly Kajal is at fault for Tanya’s dumb decisions??? Yes, Tanya should have said the truth when she found out- it was a mistake on her part, because not only Abhimaan, but the whole family suffered because of it- but why take it out on Kajal and why slap someone??? TBH I’m not surprised Kaveri supported Vidhya lol - it was expected… because she still hold grudge for kicking her out of her own house and firm but she just doesn’t show it as much as Vidhya.
Also question, when Armaan fought the case to get back Poddar house from Krish, why didn’t they get the firm too??? Did Sanjay say only the house was illegally taken??? And why haven’t they reopened a new case to get the Firm back???
Also just asking… Idk much about law, but hypothetically, can anyone in the poddar house file a case against Tanya’s company for defamation?? Because even though she wasn’t fully involved but she did invest in the company that made the viral video and when she found out the truth she didn’t report them as well… so from a legal side, is that case valid???
0