Media in India: Democracy’s Watchdog or Power’s Megaphone? - Page 2

Media has always been biased.

The regional medias are worst.

If there is Ameesh, Navika, Arnab (but opposition did shit against him) biased towards government.

Than there is Sandeep, Garima etc who are biased for opposition. (No one calls them put even when they are even more openly biased) unke debates dekho, they never let BJP spokesperson complete their lines and keeps interrupting them, but never with opposition parties spokesman.

As I said pehle bhi biased thi, ab bhi biased hain. South ke joh local channels hain woh toh hadh se zyada biased hain, specially Tamil Nadu and Kerala wale. They toh even change the news if it doesn't please them.

Originally posted by: PunnyPotato

Media has always been biased.

The regional medias are worst.

If there is Ameesh, Navika, Arnab (but opposition did shit against him) biased towards government.

Than there is Sandeep, Garima etc who are biased for opposition. (No one calls them put even when they are even more openly biased) unke debates dekho, they never let BJP spokesperson complete their lines and keeps interrupting them, but never with opposition parties spokesman.

As I said pehle bhi biased thi, ab bhi biased hain. South ke joh local channels hain woh toh hadh se zyada biased hain, specially Tamil Nadu and Kerala wale. They toh even change the news if it doesn't please them.

Originally posted by: Viswasruti

Arnab Goswami never allows others to speak, he only speaks in between his yelling at all others!

Arnab doesn't let anyone speak, again I don't support him. But opposition party literally treated him like shit and misused their powers.

Nor I support any other biased anchors

But Sandeep And Garima gets on my nerves, atleast others have this to let others speak, but these 2 never let BJP members speak 2 lines without interrupting.

I only used to watch CNBC Awaaz ke debate when Neeraj Bajpayee used to do. He was freaking amazing, always ready with facts, never biased, used to call out wrong facts, never any shouting. That too when politics was not his main subject, he deals with Stock Market.

But now he left, uske jagah joh aaya hain woh bhi thik hain, but Neeraj was my fav.

Originally posted by: PunnyPotato

Arnab doesn't let anyone speak, again I don't support him. But opposition party literally treated him like shit and misused their powers.

Nor I support any other biased anchors

But Sandeep And Garima gets on my nerves, atleast others have this to let others speak, but these 2 never let BJP members speak 2 lines without interrupting.

I only used to watch CNBC Awaaz ke debate when Neeraj Bajpayee used to do. He was freaking amazing, always ready with facts, never biased, used to call out wrong facts, never any shouting. That too when politics was not his main subject, he deals with Stock Market.

But now he left, uske jagah joh aaya hain woh bhi thik hain, but Neeraj was my fav.

Udayan brought unmatched clarity, calmness, and depth to stock market coverage — never sensationalist, always analytical. His ability to explain complex financial trends in simple, credible language made him almost a "teacher" figure for viewers.

Lata Venkatesh, on the other hand, has always carried an aura of authenticity and grounded authority. Her reporting on macroeconomics, banking, and policy matters shows not just expertise but also a sense of responsibility towards viewers who rely on her insights for serious decision-making.

Both of them represent a kind of journalism where trust, knowledge, and dignity came first — something rare in today’s often noisy and sensationalist TV news environment.

Originally posted by: Viswasruti

You mentioned Neeraj, I am very happy. He, Udayan Mukherjee and Lata Venkatesh truly stand apart in the world of business journalism.

Udayan brought unmatched clarity, calmness, and depth to stock market coverage — never sensationalist, always analytical. His ability to explain complex financial trends in simple, credible language made him almost a "teacher" figure for viewers.

Lata Venkatesh, on the other hand, has always carried an aura of authenticity and grounded authority. Her reporting on macroeconomics, banking, and policy matters shows not just expertise but also a sense of responsibility towards viewers who rely on her insights for serious decision-making.

Both of them represent a kind of journalism where trust, knowledge, and dignity came first — something rare in today’s often noisy and sensationalist TV news environment.