Indian Media: Is It Spreading Biased Versions of Truth Or Providing Facts?
The media in India has long been called the “fourth pillar of democracy,” entrusted with the responsibility of questioning authority, amplifying people’s voices, and presenting the truth without distortion. However, in recent years, a troubling trend has emerged—news channels and publications often seem divided along political and corporate lines. Instead of acting as impartial watchdogs, many have turned into mouthpieces, offering biased versions of reality.
Bias in Indian media takes many forms: selective reporting, sensationalism, and framing issues to favor particular parties or ideologies.
Instead of focusing on ground realities—such as unemployment, education, rape and justice or healthcare—prime-time debates often thrive on polarisation, creating echo chambers rather than balanced dialogues. This shift is not only erodes public trust but also weakens the very foundation of democracy.
Yet, the blame does not lie with media houses alone. Viewership patterns, corporate funding, and political patronage/ threats influence what gets reported and how it is presented. In this system, truth becomes negotiable, and public discourse gets hijacked by narratives instead of facts.
Media-biased versions are not just distortions of truth—they are weapons that fracture society, silence justice, and turn the watchdog of democracy into a servant of power.
Do you agree? Or still have faith on Indian Media?
12