Originally posted by: scarlett22
He shared a lot because he trusted her a lot, as a friend. Not vice versa.
And his trust on his mother is not misplaced, I keep saying this. There's nothing wrong if he trusted his mom.
I am talking about Mallika. He has got fooled by Mallika. And he does trust Mallika, that's why he gets fooled. Malla herself said that he trusts whatever she says, whereas he asks for proof from mannat. Even ARS told Mannat that. So everyone knows, this particular dynamic, they take advantage of it. So they lie blatantly thinking Mannat can never 'prove' them wrong. He even trusted Malla when she said Mannat tore the chunri!!
Simple fact, Mallika admitted she let him go ahead that night because she had started loving him. Why has he never questioned that? Which honest, morally upright, innocent girl would do that?? He blamed himself never Malla.
It is the writer's fault for keeping him passive because they wanted this dhamaka of a reveal. Call it manipulating the character but they have done it with Vikrant. These are points in the narrative that I am mentioning.
Makes for good drama, though
.
The tweet also talks about 'Trust' and not love.
It is clear beyond any doubt he loves Mannat. But his trust in Malla would have cost him his love, unknowingly so, but he would have lost his love forever, once he moved on.
And chill....I love Vikrant myself.
but I feel like boxing him sometimes.
1.4k