India Pakistan After Ceasefire Discussion- Thread 4 - Page 146

https://x.com/iiamkrshn/status/1921783221936681313?t=5JVa8J7oL4JoMJywMZbuFw&s=19

Originally posted by: SherDilNetaji

you did not deny, you just asked for proofs that pahalgam happened, you claimed it was Modi's plan, you were giving theories on How India has become Islamophobic under Modi's regime and how Modi is the real terrorist.

Everything aside I really want to know what made you change your mind that Pakistan is the one who is sponsoring terrorism and India is the victim of this Islamic radicalisation

bold: No, I did n o t deny that the killing of the tourists happened, I questioned how this had been facilitated because of lacking security...I thought of it as a well planned action.

No, I did n o t claim that it was "Modi's plan" but I was claiming that it was done to make the Indian government retaliate (e.g. through using the Army, to make INdia the aggressor). The plan could very well had come from the Pakistani side by using Kashmiri extremists.

No, I didn't give "theories on How India has become Islamophobic under Modi's regime", it is n o t about India but about an ideology supported by the Indian g o v e r n m e n t since 2014. It's this ideology I'm against because it is exlusive instead of being inclusive (Hinduism is - in my feeling - the only religion that is openly inclusive)... I won't never ever be tolerant towards a 'one belief-system vs another belief-system' exactly because these systems are based on belief and can so easily get misused and manipulated.

No, I never labeled Modi as a terrorist... I may not like an important part of his politics, but that is my personal opinion and can well getting contested. However, calling Modi a terrorist would be wrong and is not even in my mind.

I think that many of my posts got either not 'well' read (= with a mind already biased against me) or (deliberately?) misinterpreted or or whatever... that was the reason why I stopped to post.

Now, I came back because I felt that there are members with better logic posting things that point to the right persons and to valuable journalism.

I would have liked if India would have gotten the possibility to harm Pakistani terrorism and the dictatorial Pakistani Army government even more, but when the Indian army got too close to that and also close to the nukes, the supporters in the West were scared sh*tless (to say it as it was)...

Originally posted by: Krinya

And here it is..

Is that Wikipedia 😂😂😂😂

https://youtu.be/woE9yDIfTuI?si=Qd5Zm688r-GdTEUN

See this man was so candid about nuclear hit question ..kuch hai zaroor bahut hi bada

Originally posted by: suhaaana

Is that Wikipedia 😂😂😂😂

Nooo that's Google AI I told ya I heard this news in the morning itself

Originally posted by: Reeva_Mohan

"This creates temperament between husband and wife. This helps them produce children with no gap between them"

The Paxtani sex education. Brought to you by The Halal(a) Bookstore.

Originally posted by: Krinya

Nooo that's Google AI I told ya I heard this news in the morning itself

Okay.. He was in Bunker after 22/4.

Edited.

Originally posted by: suhaaana

Palestine is a rogue state like Pakistan. You can understand it's history

I would suggest you watch face to face YT channel. There the conflict is explained well.

Govt and general sentiment is different. Always remember. Same like Afghanistan.

I know the history; I have studied it. The situation there is a lot more complicated than India and Pakistan. And there are a lot of things for which I can't support Israel. But my point is, India has always had good relations with that country. Now, there are two parts of Palestine--Gaza which is ruled by Hamas, and West Bank which is ruled by Fatah. The two are at ideological logger heads. However, the people there are usually warm towards Indians because India helped them a lot with infrastructure and aid. Many people who have been to Palestine say this.