Baap Beti Parallels - Page 2

That's too mature for some people mate. Especially when they don't even know or understand how surrogacy works.

You use to be mature than this Ajab. Trolling yes. But never this low.

Sure is...

should I go back 4 years and start replying to everyone??

Enough of what-about-ery I think??

Why only ppl who talk about legacy leads are moral policed here. There are so many posts out there which are mocking real ppl. Calling them andhe just because they have different opinion on a fictional character but ppl only come and defend just because ppl said something bad about a fictional. Maturity is when ppl realize real humans have feeling and not reel characters. Ppl come here to relieve their stress and not to adopt ppl from the show.

When ruhi can be thrashed just because she is alive and did not die with rohith calling her lusty and when abhimanyu can be called as dogman then why abhira must be spared is she a goddess that ajab or anyone hurting religious sentiments here.

I so wish jo importance reel character ko idhar mil raha hai woh real ppl ko miltha toh fanwars hothe hi nahi.

Originally posted by: Ankitanair

Some gen 3 🤡 wanted arman to blame abhira like manyu did and throw her out but aise hua nhi toh mirchi lag gayi pehele surrogacy ka matlab samjho arman ki bache ki ma abhira hei ruhi bas ek incubator hei jo inke bache ko janam de rahi hei ak ko bacha paida karne vali machine bolte the na ab yeh toh character less poppy ki chuhi banke reh gaye lol 🤣. mast kaat dete hei makers b kich gen 3 🤡 ka still mu uthake aajata hie for next faltu theory only to get clowned at last same like how ruhi was clowned in mandap vaise parallel dalna hei toh toda dang ka dale vaise akkal hota toh karte na..apne padai k time par yaha forum par phone leke baithe rahoge toh aise hi unpadh gawar baate hi aayega.

What goes around comes around

https://tenor.com/bnwe0.gif

Better parallel would be Poopy-Lusty getting between people they have no business to be. AkshNav were legally married couple and Abheemanyu was the one who shamelessly crashed a wedding to lust after his ex. And Lusty might be planning to lust after her happily married BIL all over again using the baby. Both Poopy-Lusty have no issues using kids to fulfil their lusty agendas. While neither Armaan nor Akshara had any interest in the two specimens. One is getting dragged because of vaada guilt and other was tolerating for the sake of her son.

Originally posted by: firewings_diya

Why only ppl who talk about legacy leads are moral policed here. There are so many posts out there which are mocking real ppl. Calling them andhe just because they have different opinion on a fictional character but ppl only come and defend just because ppl said something bad about a fictional. Maturity is when ppl realize real humans have feeling and not reel characters. Ppl come here to relieve their stress and not to adopt ppl from the show.

When ruhi can be thrashed just because she is alive and did not die with rohith calling her lusty and when abhimanyu can be called as dogman then why abhira must be spared is she a goddess that ajab or anyone hurting religious sentiments here.

I so wish jo importance reel character ko idhar mil raha hai woh real ppl ko miltha toh fanwars hothe hi nahi.

Because Abhimanyu, Ruhi etc are mere characters for everyone

But Abhinav is bhagwan and Abhira is bhagwan ki beti

India still has blasphemy law, ab kisiki andh shraddha ka kya kiya ja sakta hai

Originally posted by: ff45reader

Sure is...

should I go back 4 years and start replying to everyone??

Enough of what-about-ery I think??

No

But the first reply said surrogate was incubator and used derogatory terms for members - real people but you don't have any issues with that, you had issues with the follow up reply

Ye hypocrisy kya kehlata hai?

So surrogate can be called anything but not egg donor?

Even in this thread the first derogatory remark came from Abhira fan but you didn't have any issues with it, that Abhira fan not only abused Ruhi but other members as well but wo to chalta hai na

Originally posted by: firewings_diya

Why only ppl who talk about legacy leads are moral policed here. There are so many posts out there which are mocking real ppl. Calling them andhe just because they have different opinion on a fictional character but ppl only come and defend just because ppl said something bad about a fictional. Maturity is when ppl realize real humans have feeling and not reel characters. Ppl come here to relieve their stress and not to adopt ppl from the show.

When ruhi can be thrashed just because she is alive and did not die with rohith calling her lusty and when abhimanyu can be called as dogman then why abhira must be spared is she a goddess that ajab or anyone hurting religious sentiments here.

I so wish jo importance reel character ko idhar mil raha hai woh real ppl ko miltha toh fanwars hothe hi nahi.

Now suddenly when it's about your fave, y’all wanna act like saints preaching peace and maturity. Every character is fictional jeez, not just the ones you don’t like. So stop with the selective outrage. It's getting so repetitive If people think it’s totally fine to troll Ruhi—wish miscarriage, her baby’s death, or even her own death—and call it “just fiction,” then why does it suddenly become a moral issue when someone trolls Abhira? How come when it’s about Ruhi (fictional character) , it’s fun and harmless trolling, but when it’s about Abhira( fictional character) , people start giving lectures on society, morals, and values?

And let’s not forget—the same kind of people who say “don’t stoop so low to troll a fictional character” are the ones who clapped and cheered when another fictional woman was getting dragged left, right, and center. Here’s the truth: If trolling one fictional character is wrong, then trolling all fictional characters is wrong. You can’t pick and choose when to bring ethics into fandom conversations just because your preferred character is under fire.

So yeah, don’t play moral police only when your fave gets hit. Keep the same energy for all, or admit the double standards. Because at the end of the day, all these characters are fictional—and if someone is okay with trolling one, they have no moral ground to police others. 🤡🤡🤡🤡