Who is technically a better actor? - Page 3

I meant it ,when I said that the dream 11 ads are like a movie release.Adding Vicky during Chhaava release..

sorry ,link was not working..

Minty,now we deserve Hithik vs RK -who is the better actor.

Will you do it?

Originally posted by: Stone-Cold

Both are top tier actors. I’d say Aamir, Shahrkh and Ajay are the best of their era.

I give the edge to SRK

SRK is a poor actor front of Aamir and Ajay.

He has done only a handful of notable natural performances in films like Swades, chak de and few more mainly due to the directors who have restrained his ability of over acting.

He is just a star with an immense aura, this is his major USP, he is not a capable and natural performer with layers and intricate nuances in his acting performances

---------------------------------

Shahrukh Khan

Please write at least 4 words or 20 characters

Originally posted by: Clochette

From your comment, I only want to reply on the last remark about SRK in comparison to Aamir:

I think that it is everybody’s choice to reduce SRK to his romantic roles and arms spreading (people still ask him to do so and cheer when he obliged), but calling him less versatile than Aamir is unfair (and even wrong). Going through the different role-departments a really good actor should be able to play successfully (comedy, romance, drama, action, etc. and positive hero, anti-hero, antagonist, villain, loser, lover boy, etc.), Aamir definitely isn’t more versatile than SRK.

Btw, I did not vote as I don’t know what Minty means with “technically”.

SRK acting as a anti-hero, antagonist, villain, loser is all related to romance. Kajol and Urmila too did similar roles. The characters that Amir had played are much more versatile than SRK's. This is my personal view. SRK has more fan following than Aamir. People associate with him more than Aamir.

Well, of course it's your personal view and I also go just with my own perception. Moreover, I don't have watched all of Aamir's movies...still, I find it unfair that people focus on the romance-tag for SRK. I think, in many Aamir movies, there also is romance...it's part of the Masala concept.

Originally posted by: Sea-stars

SRK acting as a anti-hero, antagonist, villain, loser is all related to romance. Kajol and Urmila too did similar roles. The characters that Amir had played are much more versatile than SRK's. This is my personal view. SRK has more fan following than Aamir. People associate with him more than Aamir.

Bazigaar was not about romance. it was about revenge. he was using the girls to reach to their father.

both were wonderful in many movies, but shah charm was unmatchable!

Originally posted by: DivineAngel

Bazigaar was not about romance. it was about revenge. he was using the girls to reach to their father.

And he did immense amount of oodles of overacting in it and also in Darr 😂

with surface level in your face shallow performances.

Aamir was ten times better in Raakh (got NA nomination) and Earth-1947 in dark characters.

Originally posted by: sharaban

And he did immense amount of oodles of overacting in it and also in Darr 😂

with surface level in your face shallow performances.

Aamir was ten times better in Raakh (got NA nomination) and Earth-1947 in dark characters.

now who did overacting and who didn't that is personal opinion. his performance in darr and bazigar are still talked about. i have barely heard about those two Aamir movies.