Armaan deserved it for doing the same to Daksh/Ruhaan - Page 17

Originally posted by: Manny_123

The thread is about Armaan but the discussion was about Dr. Abhimanyu Birla..it clearly means someone was itching to pick a fight with someone

Originally posted by: Krinya

You're mistaken. I like a lot of things abt the show apart from the leads , it's good entertainment , albeit in a funny way ..but since a part of the audience ONLY watch it for the chemistry and actors , they think that's the only watchable part of the show. For me , apart from chemistry & lead actors , everything is decent as per itv standards... I watch it , have a good laugh , have fun discussing it..that's about it..I try my best to limit myself to certain threads so as to not spoil the fun for others but can't control everyone ..

Something similar, I watch it out of habit since i regularly watched 3 for HC and fell in love with aru, ru and kiddo abir and disliked ak for hypocrisy..i like discussing but I refrained since I dislike being bullied..but baby swap pushed me to comment and I try my best to limit to certain threads and not spoil it for simps or peep who love the leads

Idk why people are so bothered about others wasting their time. Papa hai kya humare? Or they are giving us money to use internet?

Obsessing over small things, dreaming hoping, drooling over leads and "chemistry", whining about others opinion...like on man don't be mohalle wali aunty. You enjoy and let others breathe too 👌

Originally posted by: AnjuRish

Something similar, I watch it out of habit since i regularly watched 3 for HC and fell in love with aru, ru and kiddo abir and disliked ak for hypocrisy..i like discussing but I refrained since I dislike being bullied..but baby swap pushed me to comment and I try my best to limit to certain threads and not spoil it for simps or peep who love the leads

Originally posted by: theromanticcrap

Your point about Armaan and Vidya being in similar situations is fair, but the key difference lies in their intent, the choices they had, and how their actions affected others.

1. Intent & Power Dynamics

Vidya’s decision to hide the truth was rooted in personal fear—fear of losing Madhav, fear of her marriage falling apart, and pressure from Kaveri. She manipulated a situation to secure her own place in the family, but in doing so, she deeply hurt an innocent child (Armaan).

Armaan, on the other hand, also hid the truth—but his intent wasn’t self-preservation. His choice was about protecting Abhira. He knew she had lost her baby, and revealing the truth immediately could have shattered her. He acted out of love and concern for her emotional well-being, not to secure his own position in her life.

So, while both lied, Vidya’s lie was self-serving, while Armaan’s was meant to protect someone else (Abhira). That’s the fundamental difference.

2. Impact of Their Choices

Vidya’s decision to lie affected Armaan’s entire childhood. He grew up feeling like an outsider, constantly reminded that he was ‘sautela.’ She allowed this to happen, choosing to prioritize her own security over his emotional well-being. Even after having her own biological son, Rohit, she never truly made Armaan feel like an equal part of the family.

Armaan’s decision to hide Daksh’s true identity, however, was short-term (not that it was upto him considering Abhira exposed the truth). He wasn’t trying to manipulate Abhira but rather shield her from pain at a vulnerable moment. His choice did have consequences, but the scale of harm is different. He didn’t create a life-altering identity crisis for someone in the way Vidya did for him.

If Armaan and Abhira had raised Daksh for 30 years, even after having their own biological child later, they wouldn’t have treated him as ‘sautela’ or made him feel like an outsider. The foundation of their parenting wouldn’t have been built on favoritism or insecurity the way Vidya’s was. While Abhira would have been devastated upon learning the truth, the love and care she gave Daksh would have remained unchanged. The difference is that Vidya allowed family politics and her own fears to dictate her treatment of Armaan, whereas Armaan and Abhira’s love for Daksh wouldn’t have been conditional.

3. Why Armaan Can’t ‘Understand’ Vidya

The answer lies in the aftermath of their lies.

When Vidya’s lie was exposed, she never truly took responsibility. She justified her actions, expecting Armaan to understand why she did it. Instead of apologizing for the pain she caused, she defended herself, making it seem like she had no choice. Her focus was on her own struggles, not on the hurt she inflicted on Armaan.

Armaan, on the other hand, did acknowledge his mistakes when the truth about Daksh came out. He didn’t try to justify himself or shift blame—he faced the consequences head-on. Abhira, rightfully furious, left him, and instead of making excuses, he asked for forgiveness. The key difference here is that Armaan didn’t try to downplay Abhira’s pain the way Vidya did with him. He accepted her anger, understanding that he had broken her trust.

This is why Armaan isn’t a hypocrite. He made a terrible mistake, but unlike Vidya, he owned up to it instead of expecting immediate understanding or forgiveness.

4. Is Armaan Still Wrong? Yes.

Just because his lie came from a place of love doesn’t make it right. He made a choice for Abhira that wasn’t his to make. No matter his intentions, the truth did hurt her and Ruhi. But his situation isn’t identical to Vidya’s—his lie was for someone else’s emotional well-being, whereas Vidya’s was for her own security.

That’s the difference. It’s not about saying "Vidya is right, Armaan is wrong." It’s about understanding the shades of grey in their actions.

Conclusion – Is Armaan a Hypocrite?

If Armaan justifies his own lie while condemning Vidya for hers, then yes, he would be a hypocrite. But if he acknowledges that both of them made grave mistakes and holds himself accountable, then his anger toward Vidya stems from deep emotional wounds rather than hypocrisy.

The real difference lies in their response once the truth was exposed. Vidya never truly took responsibility—she justified her actions and expected Armaan to understand. She never fully acknowledged the emotional damage she caused. Armaan, however, faced the consequences of his deception, accepted Abhira’s anger, and asked for forgiveness.

In one of the messages you'd written that some of us use the excuse of weak writing & something like that to defend the side characters .

Likewise ,The best excuse to defend the leads is the intent . It doesn't work with me somehow . It just puts arman and vidya in the same bracket . When going gets tough the tough gets going. Very difficult to take sane decisions during the time of conflict & vulnerability but one tries to self preserve too , also take a decision causing minimum damage also rectify it later . So none of them basically qualify as better for me . There's a situation in which both took wrong decisions , one was caught early , another after 30 yrs ..if arman himself revealed the truth , I'd say yes he has a conscience. If he refused to take "revenge" from abhira I'd say yes he has a conscience and he's a better one..daksh kaand Ho gaya and he cries , for himself and abhira , their rishta , not for ruhi , big deal ! Same thing vidya does.she cries for herself , her marriage , not for arman .

If abhiman brought up daksh well what does it change? A lie is still a lie that's what he was complaining to vidya . That's what Neil fought for her in gen 3.

Firstly frm the time I'm watching, I've never seen vidya make feel arman sautela . It was always kaveri . Arman on the other hand was always attached to vidya , more than his father and I don't see vidyas ulterior motive here , she anyways didn't get madhavs attention uptil the point of armans wedding ..their relation was amways shaky...still arman got the best of everything did he not ?. Till date he was praising vidya for being there , so much so that after shrap he feared separation frm her and went to extreme lengths to please her.

Ab I'm not trying to defend vidya here , she is what she is , but I judge arman for his actions and today if he tells me that he mistreated abhira bec he was made to feel sautela in the house, he was trying to please vidya and kaveri , I won't buy it. His treatment from his family has nothing to do with how he treated abhira , I'm firm on this . He mixed all the issues & tried to victimize himself while blaming everything on kaveri and vidya .

I feel his complaints on confidence self esteem and making him feel paraya should be addressed to madhav more than vidya . What he did with daksh is done and dusted but there should be a self reflection . Most imp is , if he actually means a word of what he said , he shouldn't come bk to poddars.

Originally posted by: Krinya

You're mistaken. I like a lot of things abt the show apart from the leads , it's good entertainment , albeit in a funny way ..but since a part of the audience ONLY watch it for the chemistry and actors , they think that's the only watchable part of the show. For me , apart from chemistry & lead actors , everything is decent as per itv standards... I watch it , have a good laugh , have fun discussing it..that's about it..I try my best to limit myself to certain threads so as to not spoil the fun for others but can't control everyone ..

When we know we can't accept others pov it's better stay away instead of rippling the soap and have the foam on face.

Why go get kicked in aaa byl mujhe maar mode

Originally posted by: ltelidevara

Ruhi is wrong for not giving milk to hungry child and Armaan is way more worse cos he didn’t tell her atleast then to feed her baby revealing the truth.

Rohit ke muh pe toh taala laga tha na. His child, his flesh and blood was crying out of hunger and he was still busy stopping Armaan from telling the truth. Also, there's no one worse than Ruhi, not by a long shot. Even if we find a hungry infant on roadside, people will try to do something to help. Imagine ignoring your own sister's child crying himself sick out of hunger and not even feeling an ounce of sympathy.

Originally posted by: janecastle

Rohit ke muh pe toh taala laga tha na. His child, his flesh and blood was crying out of hunger and he was still busy stopping Armaan from telling the truth. Also, there's no one worse than Ruhi, not by a long shot. Even if we find a hungry infant on roadside, people will try to do something to help. Imagine ignoring your own sister's child crying himself sick out of hunger and not even feeling an ounce of sympathy.

Originally posted by: Manny_123

The thread is about Armaan but the discussion was about Dr. Abhimanyu Birla..it clearly means someone was itching to pick a fight with someone

I was literally criticizing both Abhimanyu and Akshara as parents in my reply and they come with their abba dabba jabba

These bhakts of characters will never understand what it means to discuss story and characters

Originally posted by: Krinya

You're mistaken. I like a lot of things abt the show apart from the leads , it's good entertainment , albeit in a funny way ..but since a part of the audience ONLY watch it for the chemistry and actors , they think that's the only watchable part of the show. For me , apart from chemistry & lead actors , everything is decent as per itv standards... I watch it , have a good laugh , have fun discussing it..that's about it..I try my best to limit myself to certain threads so as to not spoil the fun for others but can't control everyone ..

There are 50 threads where people love leads, they have blocked me, they should seek help if a ID they have blocked posting something is bothering them so much that they crying since yesterday

I don't go where Abhimaan fans talk about sex 24/7, their life their choice