yrkkh upcoming twist

News is circulating that daksh belongs to abhira not ruhi.. after watching the whole baby track
it feels illogical and Undigestible!!!
Did anyone else catch today’s episode? Even Abhira mentioned her past dreams about another baby crying, and it feels like the makers are dropping subtle hints about Daksh being tied to her somehow. Honestly, the idea of Daksh being Abhira's child still feels completely illogical and hard to digest.

If the makers do go this route, it seems like they’re trying to push the narrative that only the female lead can give the so-called “first vaaris” to the family. But at what cost? It feels like they’re willing to destroy logic, screen presence, lead-centric tracks, and the overall story just to make this point.

If this happens, it’s going to ruin trust in the storytelling because subconsciously, we’ll always feel like they can flip the narrative anytime in the future. It’ll become hard to connect with the story or believe anything they’re showing.

Also, seeing Abhimaan as parents feels so unnatural—it comes across as forced and not aligned with the characters’ journey so far. What are your thoughts? Do you think this is where the story is headed, or are they just throwing red herrings at us?

Originally posted by: chin06

If the makers do go this route, it seems like they’re trying to push the narrative that only the female lead can give the so-called “first vaaris” to the family.

But it changed during gen 3 yaar.

Gen 1: Akshara's son Naksh is the first and only male heir carrying Singhania name later his son Krish Singhania

Gen 2: Naira's son Kairav is the first male heir, Vansh was not biologically a Goenka but Vatsal was.

Gen 3: Not Akshara but Shefali's son Shivansh was the first male heir. Abhir was second.

Also if the baby's is truly Abheera's why was she getting all the signs of her deceased bsp and Roohi claiming Daksh as her baby 🤔💭

Originally posted by: chin06

If this happens, it’s going to ruin trust in the storytelling because subconsciously, we’ll always feel like they can flip the narrative anytime in the future. It’ll become hard to connect with the story or believe anything they’re showing.

Unke jo dil mein aayga wohi dikhaenge, logical or illogical doesn't matter

I thought some spoilers are inside

Originally posted by: chin06

News is circulating that daksh belongs to abhira not ruhi.. after watching the whole baby track
it feels illogical and Undigestible!!!
Did anyone else catch today’s episode? Even Abhira mentioned her past dreams about another baby crying, and it feels like the makers are dropping subtle hints about Daksh being tied to her somehow. Honestly, the idea of Daksh being Abhira's child still feels completely illogical and hard to digest.

If the makers do go this route, it seems like they’re trying to push the narrative that only the female lead can give the so-called “first vaaris” to the family. But at what cost? It feels like they’re willing to destroy logic, screen presence, lead-centric tracks, and the overall story just to make this point.

If this happens, it’s going to ruin trust in the storytelling because subconsciously, we’ll always feel like they can flip the narrative anytime in the future. It’ll become hard to connect with the story or believe anything they’re showing.

Also, seeing Abhimaan as parents feels so unnatural—it comes across as forced and not aligned with the characters’ journey so far. What are your thoughts? Do you think this is where the story is headed, or are they just throwing red herrings at us?

The way they showed the story - from the smallest to biggest incident - all point the baby is of Ruhi.

The doctor mentioned the BSP passed away in the womb. Also Abhira's pregnancy was already complicated with chances of fetal or Maternal mortality. And in case everyone forgot, Abhira had to go to hospital right after that small leap cuz she couldn't feel her baby. Doctor said it's very critical time for baby, anything could happen. Also Abhira was having pains from the godhbharai itself. It's very likely the baby passed away in her womb the morning or the day before. At this late in pregnancy, if fetal death occur, body can induce labour. Logically this is what seems to have happened.

Also for people saying Ruhi's baby is less likely to survive due to the accident. Ruhi got labour pains as she as driving. She stopped and got hit from behind. She was safely on her seat and baby safely in her womb. She fell into coma because she hit her head. Her baby always a chance for safer birth than Abhira's. Also if anyone is forgetting, Kriti's car flipped but Krish was born fine. Ruhi accident was definitely not as bad.

Also I felt so odd when Abhira in precap said " only real mumma can feel connection. Baby recognises real mumma". I know she's in shocked and that's fine. Nothing on her. But if the dkp follow real mumma-real baby connection as in biological way, that would be vile. Abhira can feel connection to Daksh cuz she fed and took care of him, she need not be his biological mother. Adopted and foster moms feel the connection.

All the build-up would go to waste if baby is not Ruhi's. Abhira can mourn her child, become a top notch lawyer than after certain period have a baby.

No need to rush, let Ruhi have her baby. And the baby is not a toy. DKP can keep the mum week after week.

But yes, unfortunately, they might take the illogical path of making the baby BSP.