Ruhi is super evil- Page 4

Exactly. See that is the biggest problem. When you divert attention away from the crime and try to portray the positive character as innocent despite committing a crime, that's when the problem arises. This should have been Ruhi and Abhira vs Armaan and Rohit incident, where the former 2 sue and divorce their red flags of husbands (before anyone asks, Ruhi was not innocent earlier. In this baby kidnapping incident, she is the victim but that does not justify her behavior with the baby). But how to divert attention away from and whitewash Armaan and Rohit, turn Ruhi more evil and make this Ruhi vs Abhira.

Originally posted by: Krinya

Expecting positivity from a negative character is ok

We were complaining coz a positive char is acting despicable & getting away with it.

The writers are turning it into ruhi vs abhira and that's the worst.. and what's worse than that is they will play ek hazaro mein meri behna hai in the following episode

Exactly. No one is defending or asking Ruhi to be redeemed. Everyone is asking for the 2 brothers to be shown as the criminals they are.

Originally posted by: Rosh4rose

Ruhi hates Abhira from the day she came to know Abhira is "her adorable AK massi's daughter " it multiplied ( can't blame her Massi was such rare breed)

This forum makes me laugh ..fans Ruhi can't be redeemed she is evil Who wants Ruhi to be redeemed..and Why ?

Ruhi will harm the baby..yaa can happen can't say " No" ...Then Abhira will be sad..then cry

Some other people " What Ruhi will do when she come to know she hated her own child.

Ruhi will accuse all of them that they stole her baby , and made her hate her own blood Ruhi will accuse them..Then bacchara fans " See Ruhi is total evil" how cam she say but there will be a division..The absoluteAB fans will blame Baccha Chors then the Armanza fans will still.defend " Arman bacchara he was Majboor"

None of the character are special fir me ..For me now what I watch is a " Crime happened and ML & bro are baccha chors they kidnapped Vamps baby and gave it to FL to play my BSP game "....Baccha chors are baccha chors and crime is a crime .

But I agree he is a " majboor baccha chor"..I have doubt he is keeping the baby because baby is from Ruhi's womb ...Ithna bura stroy line

Originally posted by: LiveLifeHonest

Exactly. No one is defending or asking Ruhi to be redeemed. Everyone is asking for the 2 brothers to be shown as the criminals they are.

I can't understand also why must Ruhi redeemed Who wants a story without an antagonist it will become like " Rajashree movies " ...boring .

If Ruhi is redeemed, how to make Armaan look good?

Originally posted by: Rosh4rose

I can't understand also why must Ruhi redeemed Who wants a story without an antagonist it will become like " Rajashree movies " ...boring .

Originally posted by: LiveLifeHonest

If Ruhi is redeemed, how to make Armaan look good?

Now itself look is pathetic 🙄 if Ruhi becomes good woh toh gaya ...I think Armaan loves the baby because he is from Ruhi's womb ..

Lol, who said that the makers have only a grudge against Ruhi? They have a grudge against Armaan and Rohit too- why turn them into criminals . For them, drama is key. And I was saying that to whitewash all the characters, another character was turned evil. Ruhi's mistakes were covered but she was always portrayed as vamp. But Armaan and Rohit are supposed to be positive. And if they really don't want to whitewash them, why did they turn Ruhi even more evil? Why degrade her character by showing her harm her baby?

Firstly, how are they creating more sympathy for Ruhi? People had sympathy for Ruhi at the start of baby track and now, the writers eroding this sympathy by turning her more vile. If they really wanted to show Armaan and Rohit repenting, why not focus on them instead of turning Ruhi more evil? What is this if not whitewashing?

Originally posted by: LiveLifeHonest

Lol, who said that the makers have only a grudge against Ruhi? They have a grudge against Armaan and Rohit too- why turn them into criminals . For them, drama is key. And I was saying that to whitewash all the characters, another character was turned evil. Ruhi's mistakes were covered but she was always portrayed as vamp. But Armaan and Rohit are supposed to be positive. And if they really don't want to whitewash them, why did they turn Ruhi even more evil? Why degrade her character by showing her harm her baby?

Firstly, how are they creating more sympathy for Ruhi? People had sympathy for Ruhi at the start of baby track and now, the writers eroding this sympathy by turning her more vile. If they really wanted to show Armaan and Rohit repenting, why not focus on them instead of turning Ruhi more evil? What is this if not whitewashing?

If Abhira stays happy ...Every thing is fantastic ...All sins will be forgiven...Armaan is a majboor baccha chor hai na

No one disagrees with your perspective on Ruhi

I see that you conveniently excluded Armaan. You can call Rohit an evil psycho, but ruling Armaan out. What is the difference between both of them when both of them took part in the same crime? Armaan has also dropped to Ruhi's level by kidnapping a baby. He is the ML- that is the problem. How can a character be a ML when he does something a vamp supposed to do, which is what everyone is pointing out so far. And why should Abhira be the one to punish him? If the writers are not going to whitewash Rohit and Armaan, both of them should go to jail. If they conveniently just show them being scolded by family and escaping from their crime scot-free, there is no difference in the treatment towards Ruhi and them.

Biasness is also a 2 way street. I also saw posts wishing that Ruhi harms her own baby so that she can be made more vile and also some posts for Ruhi's baby 'rejecting her' by crying whenever she is near her.