Originally posted by: TianaWrites
A woman can do anything but for that she has to leave her children alone, whereas a man can do and have everything along with his family, this is the message the show is portraying. Every person makes some sacrifice at some point in life. But the narrative set here is that after kids your life is over. If you have kids you can't pursue your dreams. What exactly is empowering in this? I am a woman and I don't want to give up on my family or kids to pursue my dream. I want the best for my kids and also would want to achieve my dream. And trust me there are difficult days and like every other human in the world, we choose to make small sacrifices but we don't give up on either kids or dream. With a good supporting family, you can actually handle both really well. While introducing Anuj, that's what I thought they will show in this show, they will set a narrative where Anupamaa will learn to balance life with Anuj's support and become successful unlike how she was before but look how they have spoilt the show. I thought she will live with Anuj happily and even fulfill her dreams happily in front of Vanraj and show that he was the reason why she was so dull all that time. But instead here we see Vanraj flourishing infront of a suffering Anuj just like before. This just brings about the narrative that Vanraj was right all along, Anupama belongs in the kitchen and getting scolded often only. Perfectly empowering for women. Wow. Hats off.
Very well said 👍👌
Unfortunately these all shows are game of TRP. They don't bother what audience like or want to see.
One of the writer in regional show said, audience like to see women crying and level of her tolerance then only audience specially women can feel the leads pain as their.
They see themselves in lead. Even Smita Patil said the same in her interview that heroine tolerate everything and in the end she brings the man on her foot to realise his mistakes. So audience can feel if heroine can do why can't I? Sams goes with ITV.
35