Originally posted by: sharadrocks
I have never come across an accident case where the victim doesn’t want compensation but only justice, which is to see the driver behind bars assuming that’s what they mean by justice …but what is the case here ..Ruhi was behind the wheel of the car and she is not denying it …she is offering to pay compensation ..this is not even a hit and run case where Abhira needs to prove Ruhi guilty .:.she has already accepted that she is …so Abhira and Armaan are now going to fight over whether Ruhi should be sentenced to a prison term ? The court fine is paltry compared to any compensation that the Goenkas should and would be willing to pay ..most likely that’s what the judge would order too….he might order revoking of licence but I really doubt a prison term given that she is likely not a repeat offender ..
Yaar max term for rash driving is 6 months, but the judgement takes years so what's the point really ?
Accident means accident unless it's intentional or caused by other factors like drunk driving , driving without licence etc or if causes seriously injury / death , hit & run , none of which is the case here ..
I'm not siding with ruhi , but other than compensation, if her dl is revoked , that's enuf punishment ..she can't drive n can't risk others life ..jail mei daalke koi alag kranti aa jayegi? N courts and judges r this free to hear such cases? lol
Edited by Krinya - 1 years ago
0