WDT #9: Why didn't Hanuman save Mata Sita by defeating Ravana himself? - Page 2

मुझे भी आगे से tag किया करो कोई प्लीज.

मुखे भी ये mythological topics अच्छे लगते है.

As many of u have answered, it was pre written..Ki ravan ka vadh/mrutyu ram (matlab sampoorna purush) k hatho hi hone wali hai.

That's why hanuman , jab ki wo capable the ravan ko maarne ke liye, lekin unhone aisa nahi kiya.

Also, ram k pavan charan Lanka ko kaise lagte agar hanuman ji ye sab kaam karte ?

Ram k pavitra charan ke vajeh se hi Lanka ka udhhar hua aage jaake.

Kyun ki bibhishan, jo k sachhai aur dharm k marg pe chalta tha, wo raja bana lanka kaa(ravan k baad).

To automatically, uske under Lanka ka rajya bhi achha hi chala hoga.

Hanuman Chalisa in one minute 🙏

https://www.instagram.com/reel/C4scs8kSE4j/?igsh=MW1vZDc3N2lsYXpqOA==

Because Sita said she wanted to be rescued by Sri Ram only.

Hanuman Did Offer To Rescue Mata Sita But She Didn't Go With Him.

Because Ravan. Had To Be Killed By Ram That's Why She Didn't Go With Him

Hanuman was revered as a Maha Jnani, a wise man with intellect. He was so overjoyed when he found Sita, that he wanted to get her and Rama together as soon as possible.

He offered Sita a solution for this, but she refused his offer because she was the most self-assured and knowledgeable woman and insisted that her husband must punish her abductor and free her from captivity.

Sita was very clear about her choice when Hanuman offered her help to escape from Ravan's captivity.

Her desire was to be released with dignity and with respect. That is why, rather than fleeing from Lanka, she chooses to await the arrival of Rama.

Except for being carried by force by Ravana, she was a devoted wife who never let any man touch her. Hence, she graciously declined Hanuman's modest request to accompany him on his return journey to Kishkindha where Rama and the Vanara Sena were waiting for the good news of her whereabouts.

Hanuman respectfully accepted Sita’s decision. Her husband's retaliation for the disgrace was the only way she wanted her pain to end.

Sita, as a pious woman, cannot run away with a stranger. She was fully aware of the fact that such an escape would raise questions about her character in society. Sita wanted her Ram, a leader and role model at the time, to resolve the abduction issue in the most straightforward way possible, confront and defeat the offender. She didn't want anyone to doubt his ability to reclaim his wife's affection by sitting idle. Hanuman was well aware of this.

Hanuman's primary mission was as a messenger he had to search her and inform her whereabouts to Rama. He was there to inform Sita that Rama was there for her, to teach Ravan a lesson before engaging in a full-fledged battle. As a messenger, he was not authorized to engage in combat or arrange an escape.

We must regard Rama and Sita as king and queen of a nation. That means their character must be above par. People in a developed society hold their leaders to a high moral standard. Sita's refusal to go with Hanuman, as well as Rama's testing Sita by fire, demonstrate the high standard they put for themselves as a ruler and the queen of their country.

The Ramayana and Mahabharata are practical treatises about family relationships and leadership qualities of that time.

There is chaupaai in sundar kand in ramcharitra Manas where Hanuman said to seeta

Abhhain maatu Mai jaaon lawaai

Prabhu aaysu nahi raam duhaai

Matlab main aapko ko abhi yahan se utha ke lekar jaa sakta hoon par raam ki aagya nahi hai isliye khuch din aur dheeraj rakhiye

Now lets go more back

There was Jai Vijay dwarpaal who refuse to let enter 5 sanatkumar in vishnu dhaam

So 5 Samant kumar curse hai Vijay to rebirth as rakshas three times on earth ie hirankashyap and hirankashya on satyug then raavan and kumbh karan in treta and shishupsl and dantvakra in dwapar.

.Jai Vijay apologise abd solution of curses was that lord vishnu ke avatar se jub Jai Vijay ka udhar hoga tabhi Jai Vijay wapas lord vishnu dharm aayenge

As it was already decided according to Jai Vijay incident that raavam ka udhas lord vishnu ke avatar raam se hona tha not by Hanuman that is why it is only lord vishnu avatar that is lord raam kill ravan

Moreover according to raam charita Manas when lord Narada give curses lord raam u have to bear separation from ur wife then monkey will help u in searching seeta narsad nowhere Said monkey will kill ravan that is role of Hanuman to search seeta not to kill ravan .

And more over lord raam ka dharti pe avatar lene ka main purpose yahi tha to kill ravan that is why ravan kill by raam not by Hanuman

Originally posted by: Viswasruti

Hanuman was revered as a Maha Jnani, a wise man with intellect. He was so overjoyed when he found Sita, that he wanted to get her and Rama together as soon as possible.

He offered Sita a solution for this, but she refused his offer because she was the most self-assured and knowledgeable woman and insisted that her husband must punish her abductor and free her from captivity.

Sita was very clear about her choice when Hanuman offered her help to escape from Ravan's captivity.

Her desire was to be released with dignity and with respect. That is why, rather than fleeing from Lanka, she chooses to await the arrival of Rama.

Except for being carried by force by Ravana, she was a devoted wife who never let any man touch her. Hence, she graciously declined Hanuman's modest request to accompany him on his return journey to Kishkindha where Rama and the Vanara Sena were waiting for the good news of her whereabouts.

Hanuman respectfully accepted Sita’s decision. Her husband's retaliation for the disgrace was the only way she wanted her pain to end.

Sita, as a pious woman, cannot run away with a stranger. She was fully aware of the fact that such an escape would raise questions about her character in society. Sita wanted her Ram, a leader and role model at the time, to resolve the abduction issue in the most straightforward way possible, confront and defeat the offender. She didn't want anyone to doubt his ability to reclaim his wife's affection by sitting idle. Hanuman was well aware of this.

Hanuman's primary mission was as a messenger he had to search her and inform her whereabouts to Rama. He was there to inform Sita that Rama was there for her, to teach Ravan a lesson before engaging in a full-fledged battle. As a messenger, he was not authorized to engage in combat or arrange an escape.

We must regard Rama and Sita as king and queen of a nation. That means their character must be above par. People in a developed society hold their leaders to a high moral standard. Sita's refusal to go with Hanuman, as well as Rama's testing Sita by fire, demonstrate the high standard they put for themselves as a ruler and the queen of their country.

The Ramayana and Mahabharata are practical treatises about family relationships and leadership qualities of that time.

Loved Your Detailed Explanation Madhu

Completely agree with the narrative on Devi Sita and Shri Hanuman, and the greater purpose of Shri Ram too. In addition to what has been presented here, if we give it a deeper thought, we know that Shri Hanuman is revered to as a roop of Mahadev across India. As Dashanan was a devout shivbhakt, it would also have been unfair for Shiv's avatar to kill him, and it would set the wrong example. Though it is interesting to note that as a messenger, Mahadev in the guise of Shri Hanuman did issue enough warnings to Ravan to do what was right and guide him towards his moksh differently if he so chose to do so, but he did not heed to anything in his ghamand, and thus suffered the consequences.