Shaurya molest a girl who he claim to love - Page 2

Shanaya is inherently selfish and mercenary and wants to be a Luthra bahu. It doesn't matter to her which son she marries. I don't believe her current jap of being in love with Shaurya. She's not the devoted tv bahu type who believes in pati parameshvar. Shaurya is her golden goose. And she is purposefully ignoring his misdeeds till she's married. It'll be interesting to see if she'll edge out Palki once Rajveer's truth comes out. It'll all depend on whether Rajveer agrees to be part of the Luthra household. As for liking Rajveer, I think it's a requirement on the show that every female character of marriageable age should proclaim his greatness and declare that he's the ideal bf/husband material.

Originally posted by: Vismaya03

Shanaya mujhe Rimjim2.0 (shiv Shakthi)...Lag rah hai....Waha physical abuse ko bhi hamare pathi kuch bhi kar sakta type hai ....But once Rajveer 's truth is out I felt Her concentration will turnout to Rajveer....Pehle bhi usse Rajveer pasand dha but middle class issiliye choda dha ...And Balaji ko aajkal behno me ladayi bohoth pasand hai....Waise bhi Palveer marriage us going to be dramatic for sure ....So she may create her own level drama....

Originally posted by: capricornrcks

Shaurya has done many unforgivable things. But he's flawed too. Or was till the Valentine's day drama when the writers made him completely black. On one hand he was ignored by his father while on the other hand spoiled by Nidhi. His antics probably started out as a bid for attention from his father in his teens. Bad behaviour was rewarded with negative attention from Karan. The cycle continued with Shaurya escalating his bad behaviour casually endangering the lives of others. Those idiot Luthras except Rishabh made no attempts to understand him. Occasionally they felt guilty and smothered him with love which he no longer wanted from them.

You can't help feeling sorry for him since he's an underdog. In his own house he's made to feel the outsider while a stranger like Rajveer is treated like Karan's own son immediately.He knows that people around him like Shanaya want him for his money. And he's cynical enough to take advantage of it for his own purposes. His love for Palki took him by surprise. He can't understand her. Yet he's drawn to her and obsessed with her. Anyway his love for her has more drama than boring,sanskari Palveer. That couple comes across as perfect,self-righteous and staid set-in-a-boring-routine.Until recently Rajveer-Palki-Shaurya was written as a triangle with plenty of girna-pakadna for both the couples. In that context Shaurya's love for Palki didn't seem wrong. In real life Palki is wise to stay away from Shaurya. But this is a soap and opposites made good drama. The writers just threw away an opportunity to create more nuanced characters.

So according to you he is only completely negative after sexually harassing Palki for what the third time??? He's done it twice before (at the engagement and then in KKB at Rajveer & Poorvi's wedding) and you're saying that ONLY NOW you think his character is character is black shaded?????

He literally tried to kill Rajveer after Preeta got him released when she shouldn't have, trying to cause an accident or murder people for fun or out of anger isn't called being flawed, its called being a horrible asshole.

Stop pretending that Shaurya was ever anything other than a bad person. You defending his actions as "flaws" is literally bias and disgusting. I don't care if its ITV or real life, Shaurya is as bad/worse than Nidhi and the Gen 1 main villains.

Seems like you have a problem with understanding the context. At the time of the engagement, the triangle was firmly in place. With frequent girna pakadna,soft romantic music and frequent nok jhoks the equation between Shaurya and Palki was different. The storeroom embrace was kinky since Palki too seemed to be enjoying it. The KKB hair-sniffing was ridiculous and pathetic. Does not even warrant the name of sexual harassment. The Valentine incident was different since Palki had firmly warned off Shaurya.

So what if Shaurya tried to kill Rajveer? The latter also tried killing Shaurya one time during the party. Karan Luthra has two sons with murderous inclinations. He better start sharpening his parenting skills and set them both straight. One is a spoilt crybaby and the other is a pretentious smug know-it-all.

Originally posted by: Blurlaa

So according to you he is only completely negative after sexually harassing Palki for what the third time??? He's done it twice before (at the engagement and then in KKB at Rajveer & Poorvi's wedding) and you're saying that ONLY NOW you think his character is character is black shaded?????

He literally tried to kill Rajveer after Preeta got him released when she shouldn't have, trying to cause an accident or murder people for fun or out of anger isn't called being flawed, its called being a horrible asshole.

Stop pretending that Shaurya was ever anything other than a bad person. You defending his actions as "flaws" is literally bias and disgusting. I don't care if its ITV or real life, Shaurya is as bad/worse than Nidhi and the Gen 1 main villains.

Originally posted by: capricornrcks

Seems like you have a problem with understanding the context. At the time of the engagement, the triangle was firmly in place. With frequent girna pakadna,soft romantic music and frequent nok jhoks the equation between Shaurya and Palki was different. The storeroom embrace was kinky since Palki too seemed to be enjoying it. The KKB hair-sniffing was ridiculous and pathetic. Does not even warrant the name of sexual harassment. The Valentine incident was different since Palki had firmly warned off Shaurya.

So what if Shaurya tried to kill Rajveer? The latter also tried killing Shaurya one time during the party. Karan Luthra has two sons with murderous inclinations. He better start sharpening his parenting skills and set them both straight. One is a spoilt crybaby and the other is a pretentious smug know-it-all.

You're not the one who should be judging whether the storeroom touch was fine or not. Palki thought it was Rajveer not Shaurya, I swear the defense of Shaurya by his fans are crazy. You all need genuine mental help if you think the store room scene was "kinky" and not creepy and weird. As for Rajveer trying to "murder" Shaurya, he had no such intentions, he wanted to destroy his reputation and ruin his day not kill him. And after that he learnt from his mistake and hasn't done it again, whereas Shaurya after 50 million chances given to him is still the same asshole he was on day 1.

Considering that I'm part of the audience who's paying out of my pocket for this soap with one dimensional characters, I'm entitled to give my opinion. You are entitled to yours. As I'm to mine. Fictional Palki is certainly not going to come out of the screen and give hers. If she acknowledges to herself that she enjoyed Shaurya's touch even if she wasn't in love with him. Facts are so uncomfortable for our pristine mental standards. Let's instead pretend that it doesn't exist.

Just because Rajveer didn't succeed in killing Shaurya, he should be pardoned? What if Shaurya had really been killed? Rajveer would probably say "Oops I didn't intend. But good riddance all the same." There are consequences to actions and Rajveer gets away scot-free all the time. To be fair Shaurya gets away too. But at least he gets called on it. Unlike Saint Rajveer whose actions and "intentions" are always right. Shaurya was wrong to endanger the lives of the bus passengers. Just like Rajveer was wrong to endanger Shaurya's life.

Originally posted by: Blurlaa

You're not the one who should be judging whether the storeroom touch was fine or not. Palki thought it was Rajveer not Shaurya, I swear the defense of Shaurya by his fans are crazy. You all need genuine mental help if you think the store room scene was "kinky" and not creepy and weird. As for Rajveer trying to "murder" Shaurya, he had no such intentions, he wanted to destroy his reputation and ruin his day not kill him. And after that he learnt from his mistake and hasn't done it again, whereas Shaurya after 50 million chances given to him is still the same asshole he was on day 1.

Originally posted by: capricornrcks

Considering that I'm part of the audience who's paying out of my pocket for this soap with one dimensional characters, I'm entitled to give my opinion. You are entitled to yours. As I'm to mine. Fictional Palki is certainly not going to come out of the screen and give hers. If she acknowledges to herself that she enjoyed Shaurya's touch even if she wasn't in love with him. Facts are so uncomfortable for our pristine mental standards. Let's instead pretend that it doesn't exist.

Just because Rajveer didn't succeed in killing Shaurya, he should be pardoned? What if Shaurya had really been killed? Rajveer would probably say "Oops I didn't intend. But good riddance all the same." There are consequences to actions and Rajveer gets away scot-free all the time. To be fair Shaurya gets away too. But at least he gets called on it. Unlike Saint Rajveer whose actions and "intentions" are always right. Shaurya was wrong to endanger the lives of the bus passengers. Just like Rajveer was wrong to endanger Shaurya's life.

Shaurya fans like you are genuinely deranged. No point arguing with idiots like you when you're comparing that creepy rapist asshole to Rajveer. Keep saying that him touching her without her consent and knowledge is fine, you're as disgusting as him.

Originally posted by: Blurlaa

So according to you he is only completely negative after sexually harassing Palki for what the third time??? He's done it twice before (at the engagement and then in KKB at Rajveer & Poorvi's wedding) and you're saying that ONLY NOW you think his character is character is black shaded?????

He literally tried to kill Rajveer after Preeta got him released when she shouldn't have, trying to cause an accident or murder people for fun or out of anger isn't called being flawed, its called being a horrible asshole.

Stop pretending that Shaurya was ever anything other than a bad person. You defending his actions as "flaws" is literally bias and disgusting. I don't care if its ITV or real life, Shaurya is as bad/worse than Nidhi and the Gen 1 main villains.

And how come Shaurya 's action is becoming love is ...His obsession was not palki ..It's Rajveer and his happiness.....