🚩"Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Pran Pratishtha"🚩1 - Page 137

Originally posted by: KrishnaSourav

https://twitter.com/OpIndia_com/status/1751556714695164283

I was about to share this.

These people were sick on another level.

https://x.com/biharigurl/status/1751485007728935014?s=20

Originally posted by: KrishnaSourav

https://twitter.com/OpIndia_com/status/1751556714695164283

https://www.instagram.com/reel/C2ZlyijAC2m/?igsh=ZmJ3MWpxeHl0YWJu

सौगंध राम की खाई थी, मंदिर वहीं बनाएंगे🙏

Originally posted by: Moonks

https://www.instagram.com/reel/C2ZlyijAC2m/?igsh=ZmJ3MWpxeHl0YWJu

सौगंध राम की खाई थी, मंदिर वहीं बनाएंगे🙏

just last night

i watched the full episode

god she's such a brave lady truly an inspiration

https://www.instagram.com/reel/C2U6gZRtSVD/?igsh=MW94a3U4ejVqbGZydQ==

https://twitter.com/theupindex/status/1751490872091480421?t=o7Kpg2rJNTieWOp2KrtXBg&s=19

https://twitter.com/ShriAyodhya_/status/1751608419034026261?t=QmuRpDFB3tyRbP47CtoaGQ&s=19

Originally posted by: KrishnaSourav

https://twitter.com/OpIndia_com/status/1751556714695164283

OpIndia is incorrect. The Ram 🛕 was demolished not by Babur, but by Aurangzeb. In the court proceedings, the court asked the plaintiffs about what Tulsidas had written about the demolition, and there was nothing. Tulsidas had actually written Ram Charit Manas sitting in the Ram 🛕 in Ayodhya. It is also bizarre that Babur didn't demolish any other 🛕 in Oudh, but only this one. I do agree that Raja Mahtab Singh may have died defending against an invasion, but this 🛕 was not destroyed by Babur

Like I pointed out, Babur never had any deep interest in India any more than Timur did. He had in fact lost the battle of Khanua, and later returned to Kabul, so that he could resume his campaign to reconquer Turkistan. It was during Aurangzeb's reign that he had a zeal to demolish 🛕 wherever he could, & like he did in Mathura & Varanasi, he demolished the Ram 🛕 as well in 1680. The record about Babur doing it was erroneously transmitted by a British East India Company official, & ended up in the records. But up to then, Hindus of that time always maintained that it was Aurangzeb who demolished it in 1680, which was around the time he had demolished the shrines in Mathura and Varanasi

One aspect of the Sanghi campaign was to make this about nationalism rather than faith, & point to a foreign invader Babur coming in & destroying our 🛕, as if "nationalist" muslims destroying our 🛕 is less unacceptable. But their arguments fall flat when it's demonstrated that it was Aurangzeb rather than Babur who did it, b'cos the nationalist vs foreign argument no longer works. At that point, one is forced to accept that it is a Hindu vs muslim issue, and deal w/ it accordingly. Which doesn't suit the "same DNA" crowd

Originally posted by: dhun.laagi

https://twitter.com/theupindex/status/1751490872091480421?t=o7Kpg2rJNTieWOp2KrtXBg&s=19

Lakshmanji is often forgotten. Doesn't he have his 🛕 near the Sarayu, where he & Urmila are worshiped?

This brings to mind another thing that's weird about the garba-griha: Rama Lalla being alone. There have been the arguments of how strange he looks w/o a janeu but w/ a 🏹, particularly when he looks not like a toddler (which a garba-griha would symbolize) but a youth. But the strangest of all is him being shown alone, which he never was in life

• If he is shown as a toddler, he should have been shown w/ Lakshman, Bharat & Shatrughan, all of whom were a part of Vishnu's 7th avatar
• If he is shown as an unmarried youth, like in gurukul, he should still have been shown w/ at least Lakshman (like say, battle w/ Taraka)
• If he is shown as a married prince, he should be shown w/ Sita
• If he's shown in his vanvasi robes, he should be shown w/ Sita & Lakshman, or either, depending on context
• If he's shown after his coronation, he should be shown w/ his brothers & Sita, and maybe even Hanuman
• In most 🛕, he is shown w/ Sita, Lakshman & Hanuman, Sita & Lakshman standing beside him & Hanuman on his knee bowing to him. In this 🛕, Lakshman is shown somewhere w/ crossed arms, which is a strange look for him at best

This is an aspect I find odd about this 🛕. I hope they get to fix it in due course